Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29440556›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Neural Decoding of Bistable Sounds Reveals an Effect of Intention on Perceptual Organization.

Alexander J Billig, Matthew H Davis, Robert P Carlyon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Why are listeners hindered by talker variability?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The hearing hippocampus.Progress in neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rhythmic Temporal Expectation Boosts Neural Activity by Increasing Neural Gain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  10. Neural Signatures of Auditory Perceptual Bistability Revealed by Large-Scale Human Intracranial Recordings.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander J BilligMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom ajbillig@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4531-8616
Matthew H DavisMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2239-0778
Robert P CarlyonMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6166-501X

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory signals arrive at the ear as a mixture that the brain must decompose into distinct sources based to a large extent on acoustic properties of the sounds. An important question concerns whether listeners have voluntary control over how many sources they perceive. This has been studied using pure high (H) and low (L) tones presented in the repeating pattern HLH-HLH-, which can form a bistable percept heard either as an integrated whole (HLH-) or as segregated into high (H-H-) and low (-L-) sequences. Although instructing listeners to try to integrate or segregate sounds affects reports of what they hear, this could reflect a response bias rather than a perceptual effect. We had human listeners (15 males, 12 females) continuously report their perception of such sequences and recorded neural activity using MEG. During neutral listening, a classifier trained on patterns of neural activity distinguished between periods of integrated and segregated perception. In other conditions, participants tried to influence their perception by allocating attention either to the whole sequence or to a subset of the sounds. They reported hearing the desired percept for a greater proportion of time than when listening neutrally. Critically, neural activity supported these reports; stimulus-locked brain responses in auditory cortex were more likely to resemble the signature of segregation when participants tried to hear segregation than when attempting to perceive integration. These results indicate that listeners can influence how many sound sources they perceive, as reflected in neural responses that track both the input and its perceptual organization.

Indexed as

IntentionAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAttentionAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleSoundYoung Adultauditory streamingintentionMEGmultivariate classificationperceptual organizationstream segregation

Identifiers

PMID29440556
PMCPMC5852662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.