ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018
Missing compared to what? Revisiting heritability, genes and culture.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in heritability and shared environmentality of educational attainment across twentieth-century Norway.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Confounding fuels misinterpretation in human genetics.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Not by Selection Alone: Expanding the Scope of Gene-Culture Coevolution.Evolutionary anthropology · 2025Review
- Confounding Fuels Misinterpretation in Human Genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Impediments to countering racist pseudoscience.Evolutionary human sciences · 2025Article
- Estimates of microbiome heritability across hosts.Nature microbiology · 2024Review
- Genes, culture, and scientific racism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Half a century of quantitative cultural evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Polygenic Indices (a.k.a. Polygenic Scores) in Social Science: A Guide for Interpretation and Evaluation.Sociological methodology · 2024Article
- Mental disorders and discrimination: A prospective cohort study of young twin pairs in Germany.SSM - population health · 2024Article
- Article
- Diversity and its causes: Lewontin on racism, biological determinism and the adaptationist programme.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Review
- Chronic neuropsychiatric sequelae of SARS-CoV-2: Protocol and methods from the Alzheimer's Association Global Consortium.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2022Article
- Three genetic-environmental networks for human personality.Molecular psychiatry · 2021Article
- Genetic nurturing, missing heritability, and causal analysis in genetic statistics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Article
- Detecting Shared Genetic Architecture Among Multiple Phenotypes by Hierarchical Clustering of Gene-Level Association Statistics.Genetics · 2020Article
- Changes of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Associated With Maturity in Late Preterm Infants.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Article
- A Grand Challenge for Personality and Social Psychology: Competition, Cooperation, or Co-existence?Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Missing heritability of complex diseases: case solved?Human genetics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard models for the determination of phenotypes from genes are grounded in simple assumptions that are inherent in the modern evolutionary synthesis (MES), which was developed in the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s. The MES was framed in the context of Mendelian genetic transmission enhanced by the Fisherian view of the way discretely inherited genes determine continuously quantitative phenotypes. The statistical models that are used to estimate and interpret genetic contributions to human phenotypes-including behavioural traits-are constructed within the framework of the MES. Variance analysis constitutes the main tool and is used under this framework to characterize genetic inheritance, and hence determination of phenotypes. In this essay, we show that cultural inheritance, when incorporated into models for the determination of phenotypes, can sharply reduce estimates of the genetic contribution to these phenotypes. Recognition of the importance of non-genetic transmission of many human traits is becoming ever more necessary to prevent regression to the debates of the 1970s and 1980s concerning policies based on genetic determination of complex human phenotypes.This article is part of the theme issue 'Bridging cultural gaps: interdisciplinary studies in human cultural evolution'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.