Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29440499›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Transcriptome dynamics at

Charles W Melnyk, Alexander Gabel, Thomas J Hardcastle, Sarah Robinson, Shunsuke Miyashima, Ivo Grosse, Elliot M Meyerowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Statistical Mechanics Model to Decode Tissue Crosstalk During Graft Formation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Analysis of the Differences AmongPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charles W MelnykSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1LR, United Kingdom; charles.melnyk@slu.se.ORCID 0000-0003-3251-800X
Alexander GabelSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1LR, United Kingdom.
Thomas J HardcastleDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9328-5011
Sarah RobinsonInstitute of Plant Science, University of Bern, 3013 Bern, Switzerland.
Shunsuke MiyashimaGraduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 630-0192 Ikoma, Japan.
Ivo GrosseInstitute of Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5318-4825
Elliot M MeyerowitzSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1LR, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4798-5153

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability for cut tissues to join and form a chimeric organism is a remarkable property of many plants; however, grafting is poorly characterized at the molecular level. To better understand this process, we monitored genome-wide gene expression changes in grafted

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBreedingGene Expression Regulation, PlantIndoleacetic AcidsPlant Vascular BundleRegenerationTranscriptomeArabidopsis ProteinsIndoleacetic Acidsauxinplant graftingregenerationvascular tissuewound healing

Identifiers

PMID29440499
PMCPMC5878008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.