ArticleHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2018
Assessment of the fullPIERS Risk Prediction Model in Women With Early-Onset Preeclampsia.
Article in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Placental growth factor (PLGF)-based testing to help diagnose suspected pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Ophthalmic artery Doppler in the complementary diagnosis of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Pooled it
- Protocol for the external validation of machine learning models for risk prediction in early-onset preeclampsia: a multicenter prospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- The Turkish validation of the fullPIERS model to predict adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in preeclamptic pregnancies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Incremental prognostic value of the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio for adverse perinatal outcomes in preeclampsia: a dual-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Endothelial Activation and Stress Index Is Associated With Adverse Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Preeclampsia.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Association of First-Trimester Maternal Biomarkers with Preeclampsia and Related Maternal and Fetal Severe Adverse Events.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluating the ability of fullPIERS calculator to predict adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
- Assessment of the ability to predict complications of the Risk Factor Scale for Pre-eclampsia Complications and the fullPIERS scale in pregnant women in a Hospital in Lima, Peru.Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica · 2025Article
- Predicting interval from diagnosis to delivery in preeclampsia using electronic health records.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Prediction of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with pre-eclampsia and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Establishment of a placental lncRNA-mRNA expression network for early-onset preeclampsia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Prediction of Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Women with Early-Onset Preeclampsia with Severe Features in Mexico: Validation of the Full-PIERS Model.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2024Article
- Pre-eclampsia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
- Prediction of Delivery Within 7 Days After Diagnosis of Early Onset Preeclampsia Using Machine-Learning Models.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Effect of pregnancy prolongation in early-onset pre-eclampsia on postpartum maternal cardiovascular, renal and metabolic function in primiparous women: an observational study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2021Observational
- Placental growth factor for the prognosis of women with preeclampsia (fullPIERS model extension): context matters.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- The Role of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in Preeclampsia: a Review.Current hypertension reports · 2020Review
- The PRECISE (PREgnancy Care Integrating translational Science, Everywhere) Network's first protocol: deep phenotyping in three sub-Saharan African countries.Reproductive health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Early-onset preeclampsia is associated with severe maternal and perinatal complications. The fullPIERS model (Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of Risk) showed both internal and external validities for predicting adverse maternal outcomes within 48 hours for women admitted with preeclampsia at any gestational age. This ability to recognize women at the highest risk of complications earlier could aid in preventing these adverse outcomes through improved management. Because the majority (≈70%) of the women in the model development had late-onset preeclampsia, we assessed the performance of the fullPIERS model in women with early-onset preeclampsia to determine whether it will be useful in this subgroup of women with preeclampsia. Three cohorts of women admitted with early-onset preeclampsia between 2012 and 2016, from tertiary hospitals in Canada, the Netherlands, and United Kingdom, were used. Using the published model equation, the probability of experiencing an adverse maternal outcome was calculated for each woman, and model performance was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration, and stratification. The total data set included 1388 women, with an adverse maternal outcome rate of 7.3% within 48 hours of admission. The model had good discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.86), and a calibration slope of 0.68. The estimated likelihood ratio at the predicted probability of ≥30% was 23.4 (95% confidence interval, 14.83-36.79), suggesting a strong evidence to rule in adverse maternal outcomes. The fullPIERS model will aid in identifying women admitted with early-onset preeclampsia in similar settings who are at the highest risk of adverse outcomes, thereby allowing timely and effective interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.