Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29440293›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2018

A Correlative Analysis of PD-L1, PD-1, PD-L2, EGFR, HER2, and HER3 Expression in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Conor E Steuer, Christopher C Griffith, Sreenivas Nannapaneni, Mihir R Patel, Yuan Liu, Kelly R Magliocca, Mark W El-Deiry, Cynthia Cohen, Taofeek K Owonikoko, Dong M Shin and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Conor E SteuerDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Christopher C GriffithDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sreenivas NannapaneniDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mihir R PatelDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia.
Yuan LiuBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kelly R MaglioccaDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mark W El-DeiryDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia.
Cynthia CohenDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Taofeek K OwonikokoDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dong M ShinDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Zhuo G ChenDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Nfsaba@emory.edu Gzchen@emory.edu.
Nabil F SabaDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Nfsaba@emory.edu Gzchen@emory.edu.
Emory University · USEmory University Hospital Midtown · US

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
A Novel genomics-based approach to differentiate HPV-positive and -negative HNCR21CA182661 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, ZHUO GEORGIA, SABA, NABIL F · 2014 to 2015
$373k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292NCI NIH HHS R21 CA182661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored potential associations of the PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2 pathway with clinical characteristics, outcome, and expression of EGFR, HER2, HER3 in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) using an institutional database. Protein expression was assessed by IHC on tissue microarray sections (EGFR, HER2, HER3) or whole tissue sections (PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2). Expression of EGFR, HER2, HER3, PD-L1, and PD-L2 was quantified on tumor cells. Maximum density of PD-1 positive lymphocytes was measured on a scale of 0 to 4 within the tumor mass and peritumoral stroma. Associations between biomarkers and patient outcomes were tested using descriptive and inferential statistics, logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards models. We analyzed tissue samples from 97 OPSCC cases: median age 59 years, p16+ (71%), male (83.5%), never smokers (18%), stage 3 to 4 disease (77%). Twenty-five percent of cases were PD-L1 positive. The proportion of PD-L1+ tumors was higher in p16+ (29%) than p16- OPSCC (11%,

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, Squamous CellDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOropharyngeal NeoplasmsProgrammed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 ProteinProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorReceptor, ErbB-3B7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesERBB3 protein, humanErbB ReceptorsPDCD1LG2 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 ProteinProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorReceptor, ErbB-3

Identifiers

PMID29440293
PMCPMC5935524
OpenAlexW2789435720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.