Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29440283›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of experimental biology2018

Evolution of neuropeptide signalling systems.

Maurice R Elphick, Olivier Mirabeau, Dan Larhammar

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of experimental biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 133 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 270 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Peptidomic Identification of Behaviour-Modulating Putative Neuropeptides inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Toxins in disguise: Neuropeptide mimicry across animal venoms.General and comparative endocrinology · 2026
    Review
  7. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026
    Article
  8. Distant Homology BLASTP Searches.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Discovery and functional characterization of a bombesin-type neuropeptide signaling system in an invertebrate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Maurice R ElphickSchool of Biological & Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK m.r.elphick@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9169-0048
Olivier MirabeauGenetics and Biology of Cancers Unit, Institut Curie, INSERM U830, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris 75005, France.
Dan LarhammarDepartment of Neuroscience, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Box 593, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.
Inserm · FRQueen Mary University of London · GBUppsala University · SE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M001644/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropeptides are a diverse class of neuronal signalling molecules that regulate physiological processes and behaviour in animals. However, determining the relationships and evolutionary origins of the heterogeneous assemblage of neuropeptides identified in a range of phyla has presented a huge challenge for comparative physiologists. Here, we review revolutionary insights into the evolution of neuropeptide signalling that have been obtained recently through comparative analysis of genome/transcriptome sequence data and by 'deorphanisation' of neuropeptide receptors. The evolutionary origins of at least 30 neuropeptide signalling systems have been traced to the common ancestor of protostomes and deuterostomes. Furthermore, two rounds of genome duplication gave rise to an expanded repertoire of neuropeptide signalling systems in the vertebrate lineage, enabling neofunctionalisation and/or subfunctionalisation, but with lineage-specific gene loss and/or additional gene or genome duplications generating complex patterns in the phylogenetic distribution of paralogous neuropeptide signalling systems. We are entering a new era in neuropeptide research where it has become feasible to compare the physiological roles of orthologous and paralogous neuropeptides in a wide range of phyla. Moreover, the ambitious mission to reconstruct the evolution of neuropeptide function in the animal kingdom now represents a tangible challenge for the future.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsInvertebratesNeuropeptidesSignal TransductionVertebratesNeuropeptidesEvolutionInvertebrateNeuropeptidePhylogenyReceptorVertebrate

Identifiers

PMID29440283
PMCPMC5818035
OpenAlexW2787755244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.