Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29440274›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2018

Biological noise and positional effects influence cell stemness.

Walter Blum, Thomas Henzi, Beat Schwaller, László Pecze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cancer Stem Cells in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  2. Immunohistochemical Profile of Parathyroid Tumours: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Walter BlumFrom the Unit of Anatomy, Section of Medicine, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Thomas HenziFrom the Unit of Anatomy, Section of Medicine, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Beat SchwallerFrom the Unit of Anatomy, Section of Medicine, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland beat.schwaller@unifr.ch.
László PeczeFrom the Unit of Anatomy, Section of Medicine, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland laszlo.pecze@unifr.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological (or cellular) noise is the random quantitative variability of proteins and other molecules in individual, genetically identical cells. As the result of biological noise in the levels of some transcription factors that determine a cell's differentiation status, differentiated cells may dedifferentiate to a stem cell state given a sufficiently long time period. Here, to provide direct evidence supporting this hypothesis, we used a live-cell monitoring system based on enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) expression to continuously assess the "stemness" of individual human and murine malignant mesothelioma cells over a period of up to 3 months. Re-expression of the transcription factors, the top hierarchical stemness markers Sox2 (SRY-box 2) and Oct4 (octamer-binding transcription factor), monitored as cell eGFP expression was observed in a subpopulation of differentiated eGFP(-) malignant mesothelioma cells. However, we found that this transition was extremely rare. Of note, when it did occur, neighboring cells that were not direct descendants of a newly emerged eGFP(+) stem cell were more likely than non-neighboring cells to also become an eGFP(+) stem cell. This observation suggested a positional effect and led to a clustered "mosaic" reappearance of eGFP(+) stem cells. Moreover, stem cells reappeared even in cell cultures derived from one single differentiated eGFP(-) cell. On the basis of our experimental

Indexed as

AnimalsArtifactsBiological ProductsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationGenes, ReporterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansMiceModels, BiologicalNeoplastic Stem CellsOctamer Transcription Factor-3SOXB1 Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsBiological Productsenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsOctamer Transcription Factor-3POU5F1 protein, humanSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription FactorsTranscription Factorscancer biologycancer stem cellscell differentiationdifferentiationgrowth factor

Identifiers

PMID29440274
PMCPMC5892591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.