ArticleBMJ open2018
Protocol for validation of the 4AT, a rapid screening tool for delirium: a multicentre prospective diagnostic test accuracy study.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method.BMC medicine · 2019Trial
- 'Just a delirium': a qualitative study of care home managers' perspectives on barriers to delirium recognition and management in UK care homes.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Greek Version of the 4 'A's Test for Delirium Screening in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Effect of an Optimized Clinical Pathway Protocol Including Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block on Delirium and Postoperative Complications in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Longitudinal Evaluation of Delirium in Liver Transplant Recipients.Delirium (Bielefeld, Germany) · 2025Article
- Correlation Between Reduced Daily Living Competence and the Risk of Postoperative Delirium in Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Usefulness of the 4A's test for detecting delirium in critically ill patients: a multicenter prospective observation study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Observational
- The 4AT, a rapid delirium detection tool for use in hospice inpatient units: Findings from a validation study.Palliative medicine · 2024Article
- Recognition of Delirium Superimposed on Dementia: Is There an Ideal Tool?Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Needs assessment survey of healthcare providers' perceptions and practices regarding delirium prevention at a university medical center.Frontiers in aging · 2022Article
- The delirium screening tool 4AT in routine clinical practice: prediction of mortality, sensitivity and specificity.European geriatric medicine · 2021Article
- Validation of the 4AT tool for delirium assessment in specialist palliative care settings: protocol of a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].AMRC open research · 2021Article
- A prospective longitudinal study investigating outcomes including patient-reported outcome measures after surgery for metastatic bone disease.Bone & joint open · 2021Article
- Delirium misdiagnosis risk in psychiatry: a machine learning-logistic regression predictive algorithm.BMC health services research · 2020Observational
- Article
- Delirium superimposed on dementia precipitated by an unexpected bladder tumour.BMJ case reports · 2019Article
- TIME to think about delirium: improving detection and management on the acute medical unit.BMJ open quality · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDelirium is a severe neuropsychiatric syndrome of rapid onset, commonly precipitated by acute illness. It is common in older people in the emergency department (ED) and acute hospital, but greatly under-recognised in these and other settings. Delirium and other forms of cognitive impairment, particularly dementia, commonly coexist. There is a need for a rapid delirium screening tool that can be administered by a range of professional-level healthcare staff to patients with sensory or functional impairments in a busy clinical environment, which also incorporates general cognitive assessment. We developed the 4 'A's Test (4AT) for this purpose. This study's primary objective is to validate the 4AT against a reference standard. Secondary objectives include (1) comparing the 4AT with another widely used test (the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)); (2) determining if the 4AT is sensitive to general cognitive impairment; (3) assessing if 4AT scores predict outcomes, including (4) a health economic analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 900 patients aged 70 or over in EDs or acute general medical wards will be recruited in three sites (Edinburgh, Bradford and Sheffield) over 18 months. Each patient will undergo a reference standard delirium assessment and will be randomised to assessment with either the 4AT or the CAM. At 12 weeks, outcomes (length of stay, institutionalisation and mortality) and resource utilisation will be collected by a questionnaire and via the electronic patient record. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted in Scotland and England. The study involves administering tests commonly used in clinical practice. The main ethical issues are the essential recruitment of people without capacity. Dissemination is planned via publication in high impact journals, presentation at conferences, social media and the website www.the4AT.com. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN53388093; Pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.