Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29440152›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Protocol for validation of the 4AT, a rapid screening tool for delirium: a multicentre prospective diagnostic test accuracy study.

Susan D Shenkin, Christopher Fox, Mary Godfrey, Najma Siddiqi, Steve Goodacre, John Young, Atul Anand, Alasdair Gray, Joel Smith, Tracy Ryan and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Susan D ShenkinGeriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Christopher FoxOld Age Psychiatry, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK.
Mary GodfreyHealth and Social Care, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Najma SiddiqiPsychiatry, University of York, York, Hull York Medical School, York and Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Steve GoodacreEmergency Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
John YoungElderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Atul AnandCardiovascular Sciences and Geriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Alasdair GrayProfessor of Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine Research Group (EMERGE), NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Joel SmithNuffield Department of Population Health, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tracy RyanOld Age Liaison Psychiatry, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Janet HanleyHealth and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
Allan MacRaildEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Jill StevenEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Polly L BlackEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Julia BoydEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Christopher J WeirEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Alasdair Mj MacLullichGeriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilDepartment of Health 11/143/01Department of Health PB-PG-0610-22068Medical Research Council G108/646Medical Research Council MR/K026992/1Medical Research Council MR/L023210/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDelirium is a severe neuropsychiatric syndrome of rapid onset, commonly precipitated by acute illness. It is common in older people in the emergency department (ED) and acute hospital, but greatly under-recognised in these and other settings. Delirium and other forms of cognitive impairment, particularly dementia, commonly coexist. There is a need for a rapid delirium screening tool that can be administered by a range of professional-level healthcare staff to patients with sensory or functional impairments in a busy clinical environment, which also incorporates general cognitive assessment. We developed the 4 'A's Test (4AT) for this purpose. This study's primary objective is to validate the 4AT against a reference standard. Secondary objectives include (1) comparing the 4AT with another widely used test (the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)); (2) determining if the 4AT is sensitive to general cognitive impairment; (3) assessing if 4AT scores predict outcomes, including (4) a health economic analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 900 patients aged 70 or over in EDs or acute general medical wards will be recruited in three sites (Edinburgh, Bradford and Sheffield) over 18 months. Each patient will undergo a reference standard delirium assessment and will be randomised to assessment with either the 4AT or the CAM. At 12 weeks, outcomes (length of stay, institutionalisation and mortality) and resource utilisation will be collected by a questionnaire and via the electronic patient record. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted in Scotland and England. The study involves administering tests commonly used in clinical practice. The main ethical issues are the essential recruitment of people without capacity. Dissemination is planned via publication in high impact journals, presentation at conferences, social media and the website www.the4AT.com. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN53388093; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDeliriumDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansLogistic ModelsMalePatients' RoomsProspective StudiesResearch DesignSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomconfusiondeliriumdiagnostic test accuracyhospital

Identifiers

PMID29440152
PMCPMC5879933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.