Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29440010›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Effect and Safety of Morphine Use in Acute Anterior ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Mickael Bonin, Nathan Mewton, Francois Roubille, Olivier Morel, Guillaume Cayla, Denis Angoulvant, Meyer Elbaz, Marc J Claeys, David Garcia-Dorado, Céline Giraud and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Complementary Pharmacotherapy for STEMI Undergoing Primary PCI: An Evidence-Based Clinical Approach.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2022
    Review
  10. Effects of opioid receptor agonist and antagonist medications on electrocardiogram changes and presentation of cardiac arrhythmia: review article.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2022
    Review
  11. P2YFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Will intravenous paracetamol crush fentanyl in patients undergoing PCI for STEMI?Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Mickael BoninUnité d'hémodynamique et Cardio-Vasculaire Interventionnel, Institut du Thorax, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes, France mickael.bonin44@gmail.com.
Nathan MewtonCentre d'Investigations Cliniques, Service d'explorations Fonctionnelles Cardiovasculaires, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Bron, France.
Francois RoubilleUFR de Médecine, Cardiology Department, Hôpital Arnaud-de-Villeneuve, CHU Montpellier, University of Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France.
Olivier MorelCardiology Department, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Guillaume CaylaCardiology Department, CHU Nîmes, University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France.
Denis AngoulvantCardiology Department and EA4245, Faculté de Médecine, Tours University Hospital, University François-Rabelais, Tours, France.
Meyer ElbazCardiology Department, Rangueil Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Marc J ClaeysCardiology Department, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
David Garcia-DoradoHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Céline GiraudCentre d'Investigations Cliniques, Service d'explorations Fonctionnelles Cardiovasculaires, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Bron, France.
Gilles RioufolInterventional Cardiology Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Claire JossanCentre d'Investigations Cliniques, Service d'explorations Fonctionnelles Cardiovasculaires, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Bron, France.
Michel OvizeCentre d'Investigations Cliniques, Service d'explorations Fonctionnelles Cardiovasculaires, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Bron, France.
Patrice GuerinUnité d'hémodynamique et Cardio-Vasculaire Interventionnel, Institut du Thorax, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes, France.
CIRCUS Study Investigators
Lille’s Cardiology Hospital · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRInstitut du Thorax · FRUniversity of Antwerp · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRHebron University · PSHôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve · FRHôpital Civil, Strasbourg · FRHôpital Rangueil · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMorphine is commonly used to treat chest pain during myocardial infarction, but its effect on cardiovascular outcome has never been directly evaluated. The aim of this study was to examine the effect and safety of morphine in patients with acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction followed up for 1 year. METHODS AND

resultsWe used the database of the CIRCUS (Does Cyclosporine Improve Outcome in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients) trial, which included 969 patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, admitted for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Two groups were defined according to use of morphine preceding coronary angiography. The composite primary outcome was the combined incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and stroke during 1 year. A total of 554 (57.1%) patients received morphine at first medical contact. Both groups, with and without morphine treatment, were comparable with respect to demographic and periprocedural characteristics. There was no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events between patients who received morphine compared with those who did not (26.2% versus 22.0%, respectively;

conclusionsIn anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention, morphine was used in half of patients during initial management and was not associated with a significant increase in major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAdministration, IntravenousAgedAngina, UnstableAnterior Wall Myocardial InfarctionCoronary AngiographyDatabases, FactualFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorphineNarcotic AntagonistsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceMorphineNarcotic Antagonistsclinicalmorphineopioidpercutaneous coronary interventionpharmaceutical safetyST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID29440010
PMCPMC5850179
OpenAlexW2791058430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.