ArticleBMC medical genomics2018
Application of Neural Networks for classification of Patau, Edwards, Down, Turner and Klinefelter Syndrome based on first trimester maternal serum screening data, ultrasonographic findings and patient demographics.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of AI-based models in prenatal detection of trisomy 21 via ultrasonography: a systematic review.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Review
- A Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approach for Down Syndrome Risk Prediction in First Trimester Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in prenatal diagnosis: Down syndrome risk assessment with the power of gradient boosting-based machine learning algorithms.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Article
- Internet-Based Abnormal Chromosomal Diagnosis During Pregnancy Using a Noninvasive Innovative Approach to Detecting Chromosomal Abnormalities in the Fetus: Scoping Review.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2024Article
- First Trimester Screening Tests Pregnancy and Trisomy 13 Syndrome, Sex Chromosome Aneuploidy in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2023Article
- A review of deep learning applications in human genomics using next-generation sequencing data.Human genomics · 2022Review
- Article
- Adoption of Compound Echocardiography under Artificial Intelligence Algorithm in Fetal Congenial Heart Disease Screening during Gestation.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2022Article
- WisecondorFF: Improved Fetal Aneuploidy Detection from Shallow WGS through Fragment Length Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Prediction of metabolic syndrome based on sleep and work-related risk factors using an artificial neural network.BMC endocrine disorders · 2020Article
- Diagnosis support systems for rare diseases: a scoping review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe usage of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) for genome-enabled classifications and establishing genome-phenotype correlations have been investigated more extensively over the past few years. The reason for this is that ANNs are good approximates of complex functions, so classification can be performed without the need for explicitly defined input-output model. This engineering tool can be applied for optimization of existing methods for disease/syndrome classification. Cytogenetic and molecular analyses are the most frequent tests used in prenatal diagnostic for the early detection of Turner, Klinefelter, Patau, Edwards and Down syndrome. These procedures can be lengthy, repetitive; and often employ invasive techniques so a robust automated method for classifying and reporting prenatal diagnostics would greatly help the clinicians with their routine work.
methodsThe database consisted of data collected from 2500 pregnant woman that came to the Institute of Gynecology, Infertility and Perinatology "Mehmedbasic" for routine antenatal care between January 2000 and December 2016. During first trimester all women were subject to screening test where values of maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and free beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) were measured. Also, fetal nuchal translucency thickness and the presence or absence of the nasal bone was observed using ultrasound.
resultsThe architectures of linear feedforward and feedback neural networks were investigated for various training data distributions and number of neurons in hidden layer. Feedback neural network architecture out performed feedforward neural network architecture in predictive ability for all five aneuploidy prenatal syndrome classes. Feedforward neural network with 15 neurons in hidden layer achieved classification sensitivity of 92.00%. Classification sensitivity of feedback (Elman's) neural network was 99.00%. Average accuracy of feedforward neural network was 89.6% and for feedback was 98.8%.
conclusionThe results presented in this paper prove that an expert diagnostic system based on neural networks can be efficiently used for classification of five aneuploidy syndromes, covered with this study, based on first trimester maternal serum screening data, ultrasonographic findings and patient demographics. Developed Expert System proved to be simple, robust, and powerful in properly classifying prenatal aneuploidy syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.