Trial reportBMC public health2018
What matters most: protocol for a randomized controlled trial of breast cancer surgery encounter decision aids across socioeconomic strata.
Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03136367 (Comparative Effectiveness of Encounter Decision Aids for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Across Socioeconomic Strata), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Effectiveness of Encounter Decision Aids for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Across Socioeconomic Strata
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation and sustainability factors of two early-stage breast cancer conversation aids in diverse practices.Implementation science : IS · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Adaptation and Implementation of Pictorial Conversation Aids for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Surgery and Reconstruction: A Quality Improvement Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- Transforming the field: the role of academic health centers in promoting and sustaining equity based community engaged research.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Diversity of interpretations of the concept "patient-centered care for breast cancer patients"; a scoping review of current literature.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2022Article
- Unexpected Outcomes of Measuring Decision Regret: Using a Breast Cancer Decision-Making Case Example.The patient · 2022Article
- Article
- Social determinants of health and outcomes of ventral hernia repair in a safety-net hospital setting.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Article
- An absence of equipoise: Examining surgeons' decision talk during encounters with women considering breast cancer surgery.PloS one · 2021Article
- Women Who Are Young, Non-White, and with Lower Socioeconomic Status Report Higher Financial Toxicity up to 1 Year After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Mixed-Effects Regression Analysis.The oncologist · 2021Article
- Towards More Shared Decision Making in Dermatology: Develop-ment of Evidence-based Decision Cards for Psoriasis and Atopic Eczema Treatments.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2020Article
- Personal factors influencing breast cancer patients' perception of breast conservation surgery in West China.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Breast Cancer Knowledge and Decisions Made for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Survey of Surgeons and Women in the General Population.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2019Article
- Dynamic Changes Of Body Image And Quality Of Life In Breast Cancer Patients.Cancer management and research · 2019Article
- Evaluating A Patient-Led Health Literacy Program for People Living With Metastatic Breast Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in women. Mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) have equivalent survival for early stage breast cancer. However, each surgery has different benefits and harms that women may value differently. Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) diagnosed with early stage breast cancer are more likely to experience poorer doctor-patient communication, lower satisfaction with surgery and decision-making, and higher decision regret compared to women of higher SES. They often play a more passive role in decision-making and are less likely to undergo BCS. Our aim is to understand how best to support women of lower SES in making decisions about early stage breast cancer treatments and to reduce disparities in decision quality across socioeconomic strata.
methodsWe will conduct a three-arm, multi-site randomized controlled superiority trial with stratification by SES and clinician-level randomization. At four large cancer centers in the United States, 1100 patients (half higher SES and half lower SES) will be randomized to: (1) Option Grid, (2) Picture Option Grid, or (3) usual care. Interviews, field-notes, and observations will be used to explore strategies that promote the interventions' sustained use and dissemination. Community-Based Participatory Research will be used throughout. We will include women aged at least 18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of early stage breast cancer (I to IIIA) from both higher and lower SES, provided they speak English, Spanish, or Mandarin Chinese. Our primary outcome measure is the 16-item validated Decision Quality Instrument. We will use a regression framework, mediation analyses, and multiple informants analysis. Heterogeneity of treatment effects analyses for SES, age, ethnicity, race, literacy, language, and study site will be performed. DISCUSSION: Currently, women of lower SES are more likely to make treatment decisions based on incomplete or uninformed preferences, potentially leading to poorer decision quality, quality of life, and decision regret. This study hopes to identify solutions that effectively improve patient-centered care across socioeconomic strata and reduce disparities in decision and care quality.
trial registrationNCT03136367 at ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol version: Manuscript based on study protocol version 2.2, 7 November 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.