Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29439543›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Patient-Centered Care in Breast Cancer Genetic Clinics.

Anne Brédart, Amélie Anota, Julia Dick, Violetta Kuboth, Olivier Lareyre, Antoine De Pauw, Alejandra Cano, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Rita Schmutzler, Sylvie Dolbeault and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anne BrédartSupportive Care Department, Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris CEDEX 05, France. anne.bredart@curie.fr.
Amélie AnotaQuality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform, Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit (INSERM UMR 1098), CHU Besançon, 25030 Besançon, France. aanota@chu-besancon.fr.
Julia DickFamilial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre, Cologne University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Kerpener Str. 34, 50931 Cologne, Germany. julia.dick@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3325-7892
Violetta KubothFamilial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre, Cologne University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Kerpener Str. 34, 50931 Cologne, Germany. violetta.kuboth@web.de.
Olivier LareyreSupportive Care Department, Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris CEDEX 05, France. olivier.lareyre@curie.fr.
Antoine De PauwCancer Genetic Clinic, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris CEDEX 05, France. antoine.depauw@curie.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-3898-073X
Alejandra CanoClinical and Health Psychology Department, University Autónoma of Barcelona, Carrer de Ca N'Altayó, s/n, 08193 Barcelona, Spain. alejandra.cano@e-campus.uab.cat.
Dominique Stoppa-LyonnetCancer Genetic Clinic, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris CEDEX 05, France. dominique.stoppa-lyonnet@curie.fr.
Rita SchmutzlerFamilial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre, Cologne University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Kerpener Str. 34, 50931 Cologne, Germany. rita.schmutzler@uk-koeln.de.
Sylvie DolbeaultSupportive Care Department, Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris CEDEX 05, France. sylvie.dolbeault@curie.fr.
Jean-Luc KopDepartment 2LPN-CEMA, Université de Lorraine, 23 boulevard Albert 1er - BP 60446 - 54001 NANCY CEDEX, France. jean-luc.kop@univ-lorraine.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-6963-8411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advances in breast cancer (BC) gene panel testing, risk counseling has become increasingly complex, potentially leading to unmet psychosocial needs. We assessed psychosocial needs and correlates in women initiating testing for high genetic BC risk in clinics in France and Germany, and compared these results with data from a literature review. Among the 442 counselees consecutively approached, 212 (83%) in France and 180 (97%) in Germany, mostly BC patients (81% and 92%, respectively), returned the 'Psychosocial Assessment in Hereditary Cancer' questionnaire. Based on the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) BC risk estimation model, the mean BC lifetime risk estimates were 19% and 18% in France and Germany, respectively. In both countries, the most prevalent needs clustered around the "living with cancer" and "children-related issues" domains. In multivariate analyses, a higher number of psychosocial needs were significantly associated with younger age (b = -0.05), higher anxiety (b = 0.78), and having children (b = 1.51), but not with country, educational level, marital status, depression, or loss of a family member due to hereditary cancer. These results are in line with the literature review data. However, this review identified only seven studies that quantitatively addressed psychosocial needs in the BC genetic counseling setting. Current data lack understandings of how cancer risk counseling affects psychosocial needs, and improves patient-centered care in that setting.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsAnxietyBreast NeoplasmsDepressionFamilyFemaleFranceGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGermanyHumansMiddle AgedPatient-Centered Carebreast cancerculturedistressgenetic riskpsychosocial needsrisk counselingservice delivery

Identifiers

PMID29439543
PMCPMC5858388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.