Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29439377›Full record

ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2018

Recovery, work-life balance and work experiences important to self-rated health: A questionnaire study on salutogenic work factors among Swedish primary health care employees.

Lina Ejlertsson, Bodil Heijbel, Göran Ejlertsson, Ingemar Andersson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality of life of Family Health Strategy professionals: a systematic review.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Work-Life Balance and Mental and Physical Health among Warsaw Specialists, Managers and Entrepreneurs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lina EjlertssonSchool of Health and Society, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Bodil HeijbelDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Göran EjlertssonSchool of Health and Society, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Ingemar AnderssonSchool of Health and Society, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Lund University · SEKristianstad University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a lack of information on positive work factors among health care workers.

objectiveTo explore salutogenic work-related factors among primary health care employees.

methodQuestionnaire to all employees (n = 599) from different professions in public and private primary health care centers in one health care district in Sweden. The questionnaire, which had a salutogenic perspective, included information on self-rated health from the previously validated SHIS (Salutogenic Health Indicator Scale), psychosocial work environment and experiences, recovery, leadership, social climate, reflection and work-life balance.

resultsThe response rate was 84%. A multivariable linear regression model, with SHIS as the dependent variable, showed three significant predictors. Recovery had the highest relationship to SHIS (β= 0.34), followed by experience of work-life balance (β= 0.25) and work experiences (β= 0.20). Increased experience of recovery during working hours related to higher self-rated health independent of recovery outside work.

conclusionIndividual experiences of work, work-life balance and, most importantly, recovery seem to be essential areas for health promotion. Recovery outside the workplace has been studied previously, but since recovery during work was shown to be of great importance in relation to higher self-rated health, more research is needed to explore different recovery strategies in the workplace.

Indexed as

Health StatusSense of CoherenceAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenWorkforceWork-Life BalanceWorkplaceemployee healthhealth promotionhealthy work conditionsoccupational healthPositive health

Identifiers

PMID29439377
PMCPMC5817904
OpenAlexW2787974565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.