Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29439083›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Psychological Outcomes following a nurse-led Preventative Psychological Intervention for critically ill patients (POPPI): protocol for a cluster-randomised clinical trial of a complex intervention.

Alvin Richards-Belle, Paul R Mouncey, Dorothy Wade, Chris R Brewin, Lydia M Emerson, Richard Grieve, David A Harrison, Sheila Harvey, David Howell, Monty Mythen and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Caring for Survivors of Critical Illness: Current Practices and the Role of the Nurse in Intensive Care Unit Aftercare.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2019
    Article
  11. Histamine and Delirium: Current Opinion.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Alvin Richards-BelleClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, UK.
Paul R MounceyClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, UK.
Dorothy WadeCritical Care Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Chris R BrewinResearch Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Lydia M EmersonCentre for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Richard GrieveDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
David A HarrisonClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, UK.
Sheila HarveyClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, UK.
David HowellCritical Care Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Monty MythenNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London/University College London Hospitals, Institute of Sport Exercise and Health (ISEH), London, UK.
Zia SadiqueDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Deborah SmythCritical Care Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
John WeinmanInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK.
John WelchCritical Care Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kathryn M RowanClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, UK.
POPPI Trial Investigators
Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity College London · GBKing's College London · GBQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

Department of Health 12/64/124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute psychological stress, as well as unusual experiences including hallucinations and delusions, are common in critical care unit patients and have been linked to post-critical care psychological morbidity such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression and anxiety. Little high-quality research has been conducted to evaluate psychological interventions that could alleviate longer-term psychological morbidity in the critical care unit setting. Our research team developed and piloted a nurse-led psychological intervention, aimed at reducing patient-reported PTSD symptom severity and other adverse psychological outcomes at 6 months, for evaluation in the POPPI trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, parallel group, cluster-randomised clinical trial with a staggered roll-out of the intervention. The trial is being carried out at 24 (12 intervention, 12 control) NHS adult, general, critical care units in the UK and is evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led preventative psychological intervention in reducing patient-reported PTSD symptom severity and other psychological morbidity at 6 months. All sites deliver usual care for 5 months (baseline period). Intervention group sites are then trained to carry out the POPPI intervention, and transition to delivering the intervention for the rest of the recruitment period. Control group sites deliver usual care for the duration of the recruitment period. The trial also includes a process evaluation conducted independently of the trial team. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was reviewed and approved by the National Research Ethics Service South Central - Oxford B Research Ethics Committee (reference: 15/SC/0287). The first patient was recruited in September 2015 and results will be disseminated in 2018. The results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in peer reviewed medical journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN53448131; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisCritical IllnessHumansLinear ModelsNurse's RolePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotherapyQuality of LifeResearch DesignStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticUnited KingdomCritical careICUIntensive caremental healthpsychological interventionPTSD

Identifiers

PMID29439083
PMCPMC5879925
OpenAlexW2787493003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.