Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29439064›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2018

Interventions that enhance health services for parents and infants to improve child development and social and emotional well-being in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Lisa Hurt, Shantini Paranjothy, Patricia Jane Lucas, Debbie Watson, Mala Mann, Lucy J Griffiths, Samuel Ginja, Tapio Paljarvi, Jo Williams, Mark A Bellis and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Validation of a Questionnaire Developed to Evaluate a Pediatric eHealth Website for Parents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa HurtDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Shantini ParanjothyDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Patricia Jane LucasSchool for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Debbie WatsonSchool for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Mala MannSpecialist Unit for Review Evidence, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Lucy J GriffithsPopulation, Policy and Practice Programme, Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Samuel GinjaInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Tapio PaljarviDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Jo WilliamsBristol City Council, Bristol, UK.
Mark A BellisPublic Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Raghu LingamInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Cardiff University · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBBristol City Council · GBPublic Health Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExperiences in the first 1000 days of life have a critical influence on child development and health. Health services that provide support for families need evidence about how best to improve their provision.

methodsWe systematically reviewed the evidence for interventions in high-income countries to improve child development by enhancing health service contact with parents from the antenatal period to 24 months postpartum. We searched 15 databases and trial registers for studies published in any language between 01 January 1996 and 01 April 2016. We also searched 58 programme or organisation websites and the electronic table of contents of eight journals.

resultsPrimary outcomes were motor, cognitive and language development, and social-emotional well-being measured to 39 months of age (to allow the interventions time to produce demonstrable effects). Results were reported using narrative synthesis due to the variation in study populations, intervention design and outcome measurement. 22 of the 12 986 studies identified met eligibility criteria. Using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group criteria, the quality of evidence overall was moderate to low. There was limited evidence for intervention effectiveness: positive effects were seen in 1/6 studies for motor development, 4/11 for language development, 4/8 for cognitive development and 3/19 for social-emotional well-being. However, most studies showing positive effects were at high/unclear risk of bias, within-study effects were inconsistent and negative effects were also seen. Intervention content and intensity varied greatly, but this was not associated with effectiveness.

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence that interventions currently available to enhance health service contacts up to 24 months postpartum are effective for improving child development. There is an urgent need for robust evaluation of existing interventions and to develop and evaluate novel interventions to enhance the offer to all families. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015015468.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentHealth Services Needs and DemandMental HealthSocial SkillsChild, PreschoolDeveloped CountriesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicchild developmentearly interventionsocial and emotional wellbeinguniversal health services

Identifiers

PMID29439064
PMCPMC5829600
OpenAlexW2762183045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.