Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29439002›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Cost analysis of the CTLB Study, a multitherapy antenatal education programme to reduce routine interventions in labour.

Kate M Levett, Hannah G Dahlen, Caroline A Smith, Kenneth William Finlayson, Soo Downe, Federico Girosi

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Birth outcomes by type of attendance at antenatal education: An observational study.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2022
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kate M LevettSchool of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3784-4648
Hannah G DahlenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Caroline A SmithNational Institute for Complementary Medicines (NICM), Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kenneth William FinlaysonSchool of Midwifery and Community Health, University of Central Lancashire (UCLan), Preston, UK.
Soo DowneSchool of Midwifery and Community Health, University of Central Lancashire (UCLan), Preston, UK.
Federico GirosiSchool of Medicine, Centre for Health Research, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3937-2285

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether the multitherapy antenatal education 'CTLB' (Complementary Therapies for Labour and Birth) Study programme leads to net cost savings.

designCost analysis of the CTLB Study, using analysis of outcomes and hospital funding data.

methodsWe take a payer perspective and use Australian Refined Diagnosis-Related Group (AR-DRG) cost data to estimate the potential savings per woman to the payer (government or private insurer). We consider scenarios in which the intervention cost is either borne by the woman or by the payer. Savings are computed as the difference in total cost between the control group and the study group.

resultsIf the cost of the intervention is not borne by the payer, the average saving to the payer was calculated to be $A808 per woman. If the payer covers the cost of the programme, this figure reduces to $A659 since the average cost of delivering the programme was $A149 per woman. All these findings are significant at the 95% confidence level. Significantly more women in the study group experienced a normal vaginal birth, and significantly fewer women in the study group experienced a caesarean section. The main cost saving resulted from the reduced rate of caesarean section in the study group.

conclusionThe CTLB antenatal education programme leads to significant savings to payers that come from reduced use of hospital resources. Depending on which perspective is considered, and who is responsible for covering the cost of the programme, the net savings vary from $A659 to $A808 per woman. Compared with the average cost of birth in the control group, we conclude that the programme could lead to a reduction in birth-related healthcare costs of approximately 9%. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611001126909.

Indexed as

AustraliaCesarean SectionComplementary TherapiesCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansPregnancyPrenatal Educationantenatal educationcaesarean sectioncomplementary medicinecost analysiseconomic analysis

Identifiers

PMID29439002
PMCPMC5829839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.