Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2018
Randomised study shows that repeated self-sampling and HPV test has more than two-fold higher detection rate of women with CIN2+ histology than Pap smear cytology.
Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Human papillomavirus-based vs. cytology for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026Pooled it
- Does self-sampling for human papilloma virus testing have the potential to increase cervical cancer screening? An updated meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ global health · 2019Pooled it
- Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Pooled it
- Acceptance of Self-Sampling Among Long-Term Cervical Screening Non-Attenders with HPV-Positive Results: Promising Opportunity for Specific Cancer Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Trial
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of repeated self-sampling for HPV testing in primary cervical screening: a randomized study.BMC cancer · 2020Trial
- Real-world evaluation of a population-based vaginal self-sampling program for cervical cancer prevention in Region Skåne, Sweden.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- HPV-Driven Cervical Carcinogenesis: Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms and Diagnostic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Short-term repeat HPV testing for triaging HPV-positive women in cervical cancer screening.British journal of cancer · 2025Observational
- Novel diagnostics for improved treatment of gynecological cancer.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Evolving HPV diagnostics: current practice and future frontiers.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Clinical utility of various liquid biopsy samples for the early detection of ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Toward ovarian cancer screening with protein biomarkers using dried, self-sampled cervico-vaginal fluid.iScience · 2024Article
- Incidence of oncogenic HPV and HPV-related dysplasia five years after a negative HPV test by self-sampling in elderly women.Infectious agents and cancer · 2022Article
- Improving Cervical Cancer Screening Rates at an Urban Federally Qualified Health Center Family Medicine Residency Clinic.The Permanente journal · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Molecular Detection Methods in HPV-Related Cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Article
- Promotion of Cervical Screening among Long-term Non-attendees by Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling.Journal of cancer prevention · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.85.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.