Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29438343›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Development of an mHealth Application for Women Newly Diagnosed with Osteoporosis without Preceding Fractures: A Participatory Design Approach.

Pernille Ravn Jakobsen, Anne Pernille Hermann, Jens Søndergaard, Uffe Kock Wiil, Jane Clemensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Participatory Design of Health Technologies - Challenges and Requirements for Action from the Perspective of Health Services Research].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Review
  9. Person-Generated Health Data in Women's Health: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Current level of technology use, health and eHealth literacy in older Canadians with a recent fracture-a survey in orthopedic clinics.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pernille Ravn JakobsenCenter for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark. prjakobsen@health.sdu.dk.
Anne Pernille HermannDepartment of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark. pernille.hermann@rsyd.dk.
Jens SøndergaardDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense C, Denmark. jsoendergaard@health.sdu.dk.
Uffe Kock WiilCenter for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark. ukwiil@mmmi.sdu.dk.
Jane ClemensenCenter for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark. jane.clemensen@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-6127-1010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

mHealth is a useful tool to improve health outcome within chronic disease management. However, mHealth is not implemented in the field of postmenopausal osteoporosis even though it is a major worldwide health challenge. Therefore, this study aims to design and develop an mHealth app to support women in self-management of osteoporosis when they are diagnosed without preceding fractures. Participatory design is conducted in three phases. Based on identified needs in the first phase, a prototype is designed and developed in an iterative process in the second phase before the mHealth app is tested in the third phase. This paper focuses on the user activities in phase two and describes how a team of researchers, women, physicians, healthcare professionals, and app designers are involved in the participatory design process. The study shows that participatory design is a viable approach when developing an mHealth app for women with asymptomatic osteoporosis. Results obtained from the workshops and laboratory tests demonstrate the importance of feedback from users in the iterative process, as well as the participation of users and app designers in workshops and laboratory tests to enable mutual learning when developing new mHealth solutions. The regular member-checks and involvement of users helped to identify challenges associated with providing healthcare services through an app.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPatient ParticipationAgedAsymptomatic DiseasesChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalSelf-ManagementTelemedicineappapplicationmHealthosteoporosisparticipatory designwomen

Identifiers

PMID29438343
PMCPMC5858399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.