Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29438289›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Qualitative Analysis of E-Liquid Emissions as a Function of Flavor Additives Using Two Aerosol Capture Methods.

Nathan Eddingsaas, Todd Pagano, Cody Cummings, Irfan Rahman, Risa Robinson, Edward Hensel

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A literature review addressing midwakh and e-cigarette use in the Gulf region.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. In vitro and in vivo cardiac toxicity of flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Method for Quantifying Variation in the Resistance of Electronic Cigarette Coils.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review of Health Consequences of Electronic Cigarettes and the Outbreak of Electronic Cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use-Associated Lung Injury.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan EddingsaasCollege of Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA. ncesch@rit.edu.
Todd PaganoNational Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA. tepnts@rit.edu.
Cody CummingsNational Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA. cxc6820@rit.edu.
Irfan RahmanUR Medical Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA. Irfan_Rahman@URMC.Rochester.edu.
Risa RobinsonKate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA. rjreme@rit.edu.
Edward HenselKate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA. echeme@rit.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2682-0766

Funding

MECHANISMS OF CIGARETTE SMOKE-INDUCED LUNG CELLULAR SENESCENCER01HL085613 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI RAHMAN, IRFAN · 2007 to 2017
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work investigates emissions sampling methods employed for qualitative identification of compounds in e-liquids and their resultant aerosols to assess what capture methods may be sufficient to identify harmful and potentially harmful constituents present. Three popular e-liquid flavors (cinnamon, mango, vanilla) were analyzed using qualitative gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in the un-puffed state. Each liquid was also machine-puffed under realistic-use flow rate conditions and emissions were captured using two techniques: filter pads and methanol impingers. GC-MS analysis was conducted on the emissions captured using both techniques from all three e-liquids. The e-liquid GC-MS analysis resulted in positive identification of 13 compounds from the cinnamon flavor e-liquid, 31 from mango, and 19 from vanilla, including a number of compounds observed in all e-liquid experiments. Nineteen compounds were observed in emissions which were not present in the un-puffed e-liquid. Qualitative GC-MS analysis of the emissions samples identify compounds observed in all three samples: e-liquid, impinge, and filter pads, and each subset thereof. A limited number of compounds were observed in emissions captured with impingers, but were not observed in emissions captured using filter pads; a larger number of compounds were observed on emissions collected from the filter pads, but not those captured with impingers. It is demonstrated that sampling methods have different sampling efficiencies and some compounds might be missed using only one method. It is recommended to investigate filter pads, impingers, thermal desorption tubes, and solvent extraction resins to establish robust sampling methods for emissions testing of e-cigarette emissions.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryAerosolsFlavoring AgentsQualitative ResearchAerosolsFlavoring Agentselectronic cigarettese-liquidemissionsflavorharmful and potentially harmful constituentsregulatory sciencetobacco product characteristics

Identifiers

PMID29438289
PMCPMC5858392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.