Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29438074›Full record

Trial reportStroke2018

Lacunar Infarcts, but Not Perivascular Spaces, Are Predictors of Cognitive Decline in Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease.

Philip Benjamin, Sarah Trippier, Andrew J Lawrence, Christian Lambert, Eva Zeestraten, Owen A Williams, Bhavini Patel, Robin G Morris, Thomas R Barrick, Andrew D MacKinnon and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stroke, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Why Are Perivascular Spaces Important?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Philip BenjaminFrom the Department of Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (P.B.); Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.T., A.D.M.); Neuroscience Research Centre, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, United Kingdom (C.L., E.Z., O.A.W., B.P., T.R.B.); Department of Psychology, King's College Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (A.J.L., R.G.M.); and Stroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (H.S.M). pbenjami@ic.ac.uk.
Sarah TrippierFrom the Department of Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (P.B.); Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.T., A.D.M.); Neuroscience Research Centre, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, United Kingdom (C.L., E.Z., O.A.W., B.P., T.R.B.); Department of Psychology, King's College Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (A.J.L., R.G.M.); and Stroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (H.S.M).
Andrew J LawrenceFrom the Department of Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (P.B.); Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.T., A.D.M.); Neuroscience Research Centre, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, United Kingdom (C.L., E.Z., O.A.W., B.P., T.R.B.); Department of Psychology, King's College Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (A.J.L., R.G.M.); and Stroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (H.S.M).
Christian LambertFrom the Department of Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (P.B.); Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.T., A.D.M.); Neuroscience Research Centre, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, United Kingdom (C.L., E.Z., O.A.W., B.P., T.R.B.); Department of Psychology, King's College Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (A.J.L., R.G.M.); and Stroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (H.S.M).
Eva ZeestratenFrom the Department of Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (P.B.); Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.T., A.D.M.); Neuroscience Research Centre, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, United Kingdom (C.L., E.Z., O.A.W., B.P., T.R.B.); Department of Psychology, King's College Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (A.J.L., R.G.M.); and Stroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (H.S.M).
Owen A WilliamsFrom the Department of Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (P.B.); Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.T., A.D.M.); Neuroscience Research Centre, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, United Kingdom (C.L., E.Z., O.A.W., B.P., T.R.B.); Department of Psychology, King's College Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (A.J.L., R.G.M.); and Stroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (H.S.M).
Bhavini PatelFrom the Department of Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (P.B.); Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.T., A.D.M.); Neuroscience Research Centre, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, United Kingdom (C.L., E.Z., O.A.W., B.P., T.R.B.); Department of Psychology, King's College Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (A.J.L., R.G.M.); and Stroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (H.S.M).
Robin G MorrisFrom the Department of Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (P.B.); Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.T., A.D.M.); Neuroscience Research Centre, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, United Kingdom (C.L., E.Z., O.A.W., B.P., T.R.B.); Department of Psychology, King's College Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (A.J.L., R.G.M.); and Stroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (H.S.M).
Thomas R BarrickFrom the Department of Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (P.B.); Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.T., A.D.M.); Neuroscience Research Centre, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, United Kingdom (C.L., E.Z., O.A.W., B.P., T.R.B.); Department of Psychology, King's College Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (A.J.L., R.G.M.); and Stroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (H.S.M).
Andrew D MacKinnonFrom the Department of Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (P.B.); Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.T., A.D.M.); Neuroscience Research Centre, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, United Kingdom (C.L., E.Z., O.A.W., B.P., T.R.B.); Department of Psychology, King's College Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (A.J.L., R.G.M.); and Stroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (H.S.M).
Hugh S MarkusFrom the Department of Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (P.B.); Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.T., A.D.M.); Neuroscience Research Centre, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, United Kingdom (C.L., E.Z., O.A.W., B.P., T.R.B.); Department of Psychology, King's College Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (A.J.L., R.G.M.); and Stroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (H.S.M).
King's College London · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GBWilliams (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R006504/1Wellcome Trust 081589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCerebral small-vessel disease is a major cause of cognitive impairment. Perivascular spaces (PvS) occur in small-vessel disease, but their relationship to cognitive impairment remains uncertain. One reason may be difficulty in distinguishing between lacunes and PvS. We determined the relationship between baseline PvS score and PvS volume with change in cognition over a 5-year follow-up. We compared this to the relationship between baseline lacune count and total lacune volume with cognition. In addition, we examined change in PvS volume over time.

methodsData from the prospective SCANS study (St Georges Cognition and Neuroimaging in Stroke) of patients with symptomatic lacunar stroke and confluent leukoaraiosis were used (n=121). Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging was performed annually for 3 years and neuropsychological testing annually for 5 years. Lacunes were manually identified and distinguished from PvS. PvS were rated using a validated visual rating scale, and PvS volumes calculated using T1-weighted images. Linear mixed-effect models were used to determine the impact of PvS and lacunes on cognition.

resultsBaseline PvS scores or volumes showed no association with cognitive indices. No change was detectable in PvS volumes over the 3 years. In contrast, baseline lacunes associated with all cognitive indices and predicted cognitive decline over the 5-year follow-up.

conclusionsAlthough a feature of small-vessel disease, PvS are not a predictor of cognitive decline, in contrast to lacunes. This study highlights the importance of carefully differentiating between lacunes and PvS in studies investigating vascular cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingStroke, LacunarAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of Testscerebral small vessel diseasescognitionleukoaraiosismagnetic resonance imagingneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID29438074
PMCPMC5832012
OpenAlexW2789723748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.