Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29438052›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2018

Current indirect fitness and future direct fitness are not incompatible.

Anindita Brahma, Souvik Mandal, Raghavendra Gadagkar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The origin and maintenance of division of labour in an Indian paper wasp.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Anindita BrahmaCentre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka 560012, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9275-9051
Souvik MandalCentre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka 560012, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9552-5613
Raghavendra GadagkarCentre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka 560012, India ragh@iisc.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0002-0328-9378
Google (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In primitively eusocial insects, many individuals function as workers despite being capable of independent reproduction. Such altruistic behaviour is usually explained by the argument that workers gain indirect fitness by helping close genetic relatives. The focus on indirect fitness has left open the question of whether workers are also capable of getting direct fitness in the future in spite of working towards indirect fitness in the present. To investigate this question, we recorded behavioural profiles of all wasps on six naturally occurring nests of

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalFeeding BehaviorFemaleGenetic FitnessSocial BehaviorWaspsdirect fitnessindirect fitnessprimitively eusocial waspreproductive potentialRopalidia marginatasocial behaviour

Identifiers

PMID29438052
PMCPMC5830658
OpenAlexW2785409406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.