Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29437910›Full record

ReviewGut2018

Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus.

C Prakash Gyawali, Peter J Kahrilas, Edoardo Savarino, Frank Zerbib, Francois Mion, André J P M Smout, Michael Vaezi, Daniel Sifrim, Mark R Fox, Marcelo F Vela and 5 more

8 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 8 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 547 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
547citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
97.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01854970 nacompletednot on this map

Benefit of Pharyngeal and Oesophageal pH-impedance of Patients With High Suspicion of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2013 to 2015Enrolled30ConditionsLaryngopharyngeal Reflux, Oesophageal pH-impedanceArmsesomeprazole
NCT04036942 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Ablation Of The Esophagogastric Junction With Hybrid Argon Plasma Vs Mucosectomy With Band in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Without Hiatal Hernia

TypeinterventionalSponsorCoordinación de Investigación en Salud, MexicoRan2019 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsGastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseArmsAblation of the gastroesophageal junction with hybrid argon plasma, mucosectomy with band of the gastroesophageal junction
NCT04255693 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Real-life Study of Changes of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Manifestations Due to Behavioural and Diet Adherence

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal State Budgetary Scientific InstitutionRan2020 to 2027Enrolled150ConditionsGastroesophageal Reflux Disease, GERD, Gastroesophageal Erosion, Erosive EsophagitisArmsdiet adherence, No diet adherence, Change in physical activity, No change in physical activity, Use of antisecretory agents
NCT04268719 completednot on this map

Near Focus NBI-Driven Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorKing's College Hospital NHS TrustRan2017 to 2018Enrolled76ConditionsGastro Esophageal RefluxArmswireless pH capsule recording
NCT04813029 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Defining High-Resolution Manometry Thresholds of Backward Pressure Across the Lower Esophageal Sphincter Through Straight Leg Raise Maneuver Predictive of Pathologic Acid Exposure Time

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MilanRan2021 to 2021Enrolled336ConditionsGastroesophageal RefluxArmsStraight leg raise maneuver
NCT05353933 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Thread Embedding Acupuncture Combined With PPI in Treating GERD

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled66ConditionsGastroesophageal RefluxArmsThread embedding acupuncture, Pantoprazole 40mg
NCT05405816 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Determination of the Change in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy by 24-hour Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH Test

TypeinterventionalSponsorFatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research HospitalRan2022 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsGastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Obesity, MorbidArmslaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
NCT07387042 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication and Hill-Snow Repair for Hiatus Hernia With Endoscopic Evaluation: Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMinia UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsHiatal Hernia With Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseArmsLaparoscopic Hill-Snow repair, Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

547 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,416 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. European clinical practice guideline: managing and treating laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Efficacy and safety of anti-reflux mucosal ablation therapy at 12 months.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

487 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

C Prakash GyawaliDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Peter J KahrilasDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Edoardo SavarinoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Frank ZerbibDepartment of Gastroenterology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Francois MionDigestive Physiology, Hopital E Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
André J P M SmoutDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael VaeziDivision of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Daniel SifrimBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Mark R FoxGastroenterology, St. Claraspital, Kleinriehenstrasse 30, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4394-5584
Marcelo F VelaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Radu TutuianDivision of Gastroenterology, University Clinics for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Jan TackDepartment of Gastroenterology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Albert J BredenoordDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
John PandolfinoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sabine RomanDigestive Physiology, Hopital E Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLNorthwestern University · USUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRKU Leuven · BEMayo Clinic in Arizona · USQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Padua · ITVanderbilt University Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical history, questionnaire data and response to antisecretory therapy are insufficient to make a conclusive diagnosis of GERD in isolation, but are of value in determining need for further investigation. Conclusive evidence for reflux on oesophageal testing include advanced grade erosive oesophagitis (LA grades C and D), long-segment Barrett's mucosa or peptic strictures on endoscopy or distal oesophageal acid exposure time (AET) >6% on ambulatory pH or pH-impedance monitoring. A normal endoscopy does not exclude GERD, but provides supportive evidence refuting GERD in conjunction with distal AET <4% and <40 reflux episodes on pH-impedance monitoring off proton pump inhibitors. Reflux-symptom association on ambulatory reflux monitoring provides supportive evidence for reflux triggered symptoms, and may predict a better treatment outcome when present. When endoscopy and pH or pH-impedance monitoring are inconclusive, adjunctive evidence from biopsy findings (histopathology scores, dilated intercellular spaces), motor evaluation (hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter, hiatus hernia and oesophageal body hypomotility on high-resolution manometry) and novel impedance metrics (baseline impedance, postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index) can add confidence for a GERD diagnosis; however, diagnosis cannot be based on these findings alone. An assessment of anatomy, motor function, reflux burden and symptomatic phenotype will therefore help direct management. Future GERD management strategies should focus on defining individual patient phenotypes based on the level of refluxate exposure, mechanism of reflux, efficacy of clearance, underlying anatomy of the oesophagogastric junction and psychometrics defining symptomatic presentations.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal RefluxConsensus Statements as TopicEndoscopyEsophageal pH MonitoringHumansManometryendoscopygastroesophageal reflux diseasemanometryPH monitoring

Identifiers

PMID29437910
PMCPMC6031267
OpenAlexW2785608288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 2 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.