SynthesisBMJ open2018
Antibiotics for uncomplicated skin abscesses: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incision and drainage of cutaneous abscess with or without cavity packing: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Article
- [Common skin and soft tissue infections-current recommendations].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Skin manifestations in diabetes-what is new?Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Management of subcutaneous abscesses: prospective cross-sectional study (MAGIC).The British journal of surgery · 2024Article
- Mapping the evidence about the natural history of acute infections commonly seen in primary care and managed with antibiotics: a scoping review.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Renal disease and diabetes increase the risk of failed outpatient management of cellulitic hand infections: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- The effect of anaesthetic use on healing in sub cutaneous abscess management: a retrospective before and after cohort study.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2023Article
- Heterogeneous Vancomycin IntermediateInfection and drug resistance · 2023Article
- Article
- Regulatory perspectives of combination products.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
- Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Bedside Diagnosis of Pyomyositis.POCUS journal · 2022Article
- Post-operative antibiotics for cutaneous abscess after incision and drainage: Variations in clinical practice.Access microbiology · 2022Article
- Pediatric Subcutaneous Abscess: Still a Clinical Exam-Based Diagnosis and Treatment.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Enteral Lactoferrin Supplementation for Preventing Sepsis and Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants: A Meta‑Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Adding antibiotics for abscess management.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019Review
- Antibiotics Should Not Be Routinely Prescribed After Incision and Drainage of Uncomplicated Abscesses.Annals of emergency medicine · 2019Article
- Optimal antimicrobial duration for common bacterial infections.Australian prescriber · 2019Review
- Antibiotics after incision and drainage for uncomplicated skin abscesses: a clinical practice guideline.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Article
- Decreasing the Duration of Discharge Antibiotic Treatment Following Inpatient Skin and Soft Tissue Abscess Drainage.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the impact of adjunctive antibiotic therapy on uncomplicated skin abscesses.
designSystematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov. STUDY SELECTION: A BMJ Rapid Recommendation panel provided input on design, important outcomes and the interpretation of the results. Eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) included a comparison of antibiotics against no antibiotics or a comparison of different antibiotics in patients with uncomplicated skin abscesses, and reported outcomes prespecified by the linked guideline panel. REVIEW
methodsReviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts for eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We performed random-effects meta-analyses that compared antibiotics with no antibiotics, along with a limited number of prespecified subgroup hypotheses. We also performed network meta-analysis with a Bayesian framework to compare effects of different antibiotics. Quality of evidence was assessed with The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
resultsFourteen RCTs including 4198 patients proved eligible. Compared with no antibiotics, antibiotics probably lower the risk of treatment failure (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.90; low quality), recurrence within 1 month (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.77; moderate quality), hospitalisation (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.94; moderate quality) and late recurrence (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.85; moderate quality). However, relative to no use, antibiotics probably increase the risk of gastrointestinal side effects (trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX): OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.58; moderate quality; clindamycin: OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.88; high quality) and diarrhoea (clindamycin: OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.50 to 4.89; high quality). Cephalosporins did not reduce the risk of treatment failure compared with placebo (moderate quality).
conclusionsIn patients with uncomplicated skin abscesses, moderate-to-high quality evidence suggests TMP-SMX or clindamycin confer a modest benefit for several important outcomes, but this is offset by a similar risk of adverse effects. Clindamycin has a substantially higher risk of diarrhoea than TMP-SMX. Cephalosporins are probably not effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.