Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29437667›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2018

Effectiveness of a childhood obesity prevention programme delivered through schools, targeting 6 and 7 year olds: cluster randomised controlled trial (WAVES study).

Peymane Adab, Miranda J Pallan, Emma R Lancashire, Karla Hemming, Emma Frew, Tim Barrett, Raj Bhopal, Janet E Cade, Alastair Canaway, Joanne L Clarke and 12 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 91 papers, 25 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 25 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 25 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 5 to 11 years old.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Peymane AdabInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK p.adab@bham.ac.uk.
Miranda J PallanInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Emma R LancashireInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Karla HemmingInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Emma FrewInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tim BarrettSchool of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham; Birmingham, UK.
Raj BhopalEdinburgh Migration, Ethnicity and Health Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, UK.
Janet E CadeNutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Alastair CanawayWarwick CTU, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
Joanne L ClarkeInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Amanda DaleyInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jonathan J DeeksInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Joan L DudaSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ulf EkelundCambridge MRC Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Paramjit GillInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tania GriffinInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Eleanor McGeeBirmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Kiya HurleyInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
James MartinInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jayne ParryInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sandra PassmoreServices for Education, Birmingham, UK.
K K ChengInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 06/85/11Department of Health SRF-2017-10-002Medical Research Council MC_U106179473Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of a school and family based healthy lifestyle programme (WAVES intervention) compared with usual practice, in preventing childhood obesity.

designCluster randomised controlled trial.

settingUK primary schools from the West Midlands.

participants200 schools were randomly selected from all state run primary schools within 35 miles of the study centre (n=980), oversampling those with high minority ethnic populations. These schools were randomly ordered and sequentially invited to participate. 144 eligible schools were approached to achieve the target recruitment of 54 schools. After baseline measurements 1467 year 1 pupils aged 5 and 6 years (control: 28 schools, 778 pupils) were randomised, using a blocked balancing algorithm. 53 schools remained in the trial and data on 1287 (87.7%) and 1169 (79.7%) pupils were available at first follow-up (15 month) and second follow-up (30 month), respectively.

interventionsThe 12 month intervention encouraged healthy eating and physical activity, including a daily additional 30 minute school time physical activity opportunity, a six week interactive skill based programme in conjunction with Aston Villa football club, signposting of local family physical activity opportunities through mail-outs every six months, and termly school led family workshops on healthy cooking skills.

main outcome measuresThe protocol defined primary outcomes, assessed blind to allocation, were between arm difference in body mass index (BMI) z score at 15 and 30 months. Secondary outcomes were further anthropometric, dietary, physical activity, and psychological measurements, and difference in BMI z score at 39 months in a subset.

resultsData for primary outcome analyses were: baseline, 54 schools: 1392 pupils (732 controls); first follow-up (15 months post-baseline), 53 schools: 1249 pupils (675 controls); second follow-up (30 months post-baseline), 53 schools: 1145 pupils (621 controls). The mean BMI z score was non-significantly lower in the intervention arm compared with the control arm at 15 months (mean difference -0.075 (95% confidence interval -0.183 to 0.033, P=0.18) in the baseline adjusted models. At 30 months the mean difference was -0.027 (-0.137 to 0.083, P=0.63). There was no statistically significant difference between groups for other anthropometric, dietary, physical activity, or psychological measurements (including assessment of harm).

conclusionsThe primary analyses suggest that this experiential focused intervention had no statistically significant effect on BMI z score or on preventing childhood obesity. Schools are unlikely to impact on the childhood obesity epidemic by incorporating such interventions without wider support across multiple sectors and environments.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN97000586.

Indexed as

Outcome and Process Assessment, Health CareBody Mass IndexChildEnglandFemaleHumansMalePediatric ObesitySchool Health Services

Identifiers

PMID29437667
PMCPMC5792961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.