Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29437489›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma2019

Controller adherence following hospital discharge in high risk children: A pilot randomized trial of text message reminders.

Chén C Kenyon, Siobhan M Gruschow, William O Quarshie, Heather Griffis, Michelle C Leach, Joseph J Zorc, Tyra C Bryant-Stephens, Victoria A Miller, Chris Feudtner

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chén C Kenyona PolicyLab and Department of Pediatrics , The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania.
Siobhan M Gruschowa PolicyLab and Department of Pediatrics , The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania.
William O Quarshiec Healthcare Analytics Unit , The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania.
Heather Griffisc Healthcare Analytics Unit , The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania.
Michelle C Leachd Sidney Kimmel Medical College , Thomas Jefferson University , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania.
Joseph J Zorca PolicyLab and Department of Pediatrics , The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania.
Tyra C Bryant-Stephensa PolicyLab and Department of Pediatrics , The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania.
Victoria A Millera PolicyLab and Department of Pediatrics , The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania.
Chris Feudtnera PolicyLab and Department of Pediatrics , The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2012 to 2015
$38.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the feasibility of a mobile health, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence reminder intervention and to characterize adherence trajectories immediately following severe asthma exacerbation in high-risk urban children with persistent asthma.

methodsChildren aged 2-13 with persistent asthma were enrolled in this pilot randomized controlled trial during an asthma emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization. Intervention arm participants received daily text message reminders for 30 days, and both arms received electronic sensors to measure ICS use. Primary outcomes were feasibility of sensor use and text message acceptability. Secondary outcomes included adherence to prescribed ICS regimen and 30-day adherence trajectories. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to examine adherence trajectories.

resultsForty-one participants (mean age 5.9) were randomized to intervention (n = 21) or control (n = 20). Overall, 85% were Black, 88% had public insurance, and 51% of the caregivers had a high school education or less. Thirty-two participant families (78%) transmitted medication adherence data; of caregivers who completed the acceptability survey, 25 (96%) chose to receive daily reminders beyond that study interval. Secondary outcome analyses demonstrated similar average daily adherence between groups (intervention = 36%; control = 32%, P = 0.73). Three adherence trajectories were identified with none ever exceeding 80% adherence.

conclusionsWithin a high-risk pediatric cohort, electronic monitoring of ICS use and adherence reminders delivered via text message were feasible for most participants, but there was no signal of effect. Adherence trajectories following severe exacerbation were suboptimal, demonstrating an important opportunity for asthma care improvement.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringReminder SystemsText MessagingAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsChildChild, PreschoolEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansMalePatient CompliancePatient PreferenceAdrenal Cortex HormonesBronchodilator Agentsinhaled corticosteroidsmedication adherenceMobile healthtrajectory modeling

Identifiers

PMID29437489
PMCPMC6123277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.