Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29436916›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2018

Middle cerebral artery pressure changes following Pipeline flow diversion.

Denise Brunozzi, Sophia F Shakur, Fady T Charbel, Ali Alaraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of cerebral aneurysm size on distal intracranial hemodynamics and changes following flow diversion.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Cerebral hemodynamics and intracranial aneurysms: Reflecting on pipeline embolization devices.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denise BrunozziDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4154-7814
Sophia F ShakurDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Fady T CharbelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ali AlarajDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Pipeline embolization devices (PED) are commonly used for endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms but changes in intracranial hemodynamics after PED deployment are poorly understood. Here, we assess middle cerebral artery (MCA) and systemic blood pressure before and after PED treatment. Methods Records of patients with cerebral aneurysms proximal to the internal carotid artery terminus treated with PED at our institution between 2015 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if ipsilateral MCA pressure measurements were available. Ipsilateral MCA pressure was transduced via the microcatheter before and after PED deployment. Systemic arterial blood pressure was also simultaneously recorded. MCA, systemic blood pressure, and ratios of MCA to systemic blood pressure values were compared before and after treatment among the study cohort using the two-sample paired Student t test. Results Fourteen patients were included. Mean age was 54 years. Among the entire cohort, the ratio of MCA to systemic systolic and mean blood pressure were significantly higher after treatment (respectively 0.76 vs. 0.69, p = 0.01, and 0.94 vs. 0.89, p = 0.03), and the ratio of MCA to systemic diastolic pressures showed an increasing trend (1.08 vs. 1.03, p = 0.09). The percentage of ratio increase was independent of aneurysm size ( r = -0.24, p = 0.42 for systolic ratio; r = -0.09, p = 0.74 for diastolic ratio; r = -0.09; p = 0.76 for mean ratio, respectively). Conclusions Following PED deployment, the ratio of ipsilateral MCA to systemic systolic and mean blood pressure increased. These pressure changes should be further evaluated in a larger sample size.

Indexed as

AdultAgedEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleHemodynamicsHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedMiddle Cerebral ArteryTreatment OutcomeAutoregulationcerebral aneurysmhemodynamicsPipelinepressure

Identifiers

PMID29436916
PMCPMC5967190
OpenAlexW2791681082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.