ArticleEuropean journal of immunology2018
Evidence for dispensability of protein kinase R in host control of tuberculosis.
Article in European journal of immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein Kinase R in Bacterial Infections: Friend or Foe?Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- New insights into the evasion of host innate immunity by Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2020Review
- RNA Sensing ofVaccines · 2020Review
- Protein Kinase R Restricts the Intracellular Survival ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Cytoplasmic RNA Sensor Pathways and Nitazoxanide Broadly Inhibit Intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis Growth.iScience · 2019Article
- Correction: Improved Control of Tuberculosis and Activation of Macrophages in Mice Lacking Protein Kinase R.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic deficiency of protein kinase R (PKR) in mice was reported to enhance macrophage activation in vitro in response to interferon-γ (IFNγ) and to reduce the burden of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in vivo (Wu et al. PloS One. 2012 7:e30512). Consistent with this, treatment of wild-type (WT) macrophages in vitro with a novel PKR inhibitor (Bryk et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011 21:4108-4114) also enhanced IFN-γ-dependent macrophage activation (Wu et al. PloS One. 2012 7:e30512). Here we show that co-treatment with IFN-γ and a new PKR inhibitor identified herein to be highly but not completely selective likewise induced macrophages to produce more reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNI) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and less interleukin 10 (IL-10) than seen with IFN-γ alone. Unexpectedly, however, this new PKR inhibitor had a comparable effect on PKR-deficient macrophages. Retrospective investigation revealed that the PKR-deficient mice in (Wu et al. PloS One. 2012 7:e30512) had not been backcrossed. On comparing genetically matched PKR-deficient and WT mice, we saw no impact of PKR deficiency on macrophage activation in vitro or during the course of Mtb infection in vivo. In addition, although 129S1/SvImJ macrophage responses to IFN-γ were greater than those of C57BL/6J macrophages, PKR was not required to mediate the IFN-γ-dependent production of IL-10, RNI or TNF-α in either strain. Together the data cast doubt on PKR as a potential therapeutic target for tuberculosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.