ArticleMolecular medicine reports2018
In vitro evaluation of a bone morphogenetic protein‑2 nanometer hydroxyapatite collagen scaffold for bone regeneration.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optical, Structural, and Biological Characteristics of Rapid-Sintered Multichromatic Zirconia.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Composite or Modified Hydroxyapatite Microspheres as Drug Delivery Carrier for Bone and Tooth Tissue Engineering.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Anti-Cancer Activities of Nano Amorphous Calcium Phosphates toward Premalignant and Oral Cancer Cells.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Preparation and characterization of 3D hydroxyapatite/collagen scaffolds and its application in bone regeneration with bone morphogenetic protein-2.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Freeze-Drying Process for the Fabrication of Collagen-Based Sponges as Medical Devices in Biomedical Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Polymeric and Composite Carriers of Protein and Non-Protein Biomolecules for Application in Bone Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Frontiers of Hydroxyapatite Composites in Bionic Bone Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Characterization of Biological Properties of Dental Pulp Stem Cells Grown on an Electrospun Poly(l-lactide-Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
- Recent Advances in the Treatment of Bone Metastases and Primary Bone Tumors: An Up-to-Date Review.Cancers · 2021Review
- Osteosarcoma tissue-engineered model challenges oxidative stress therapy revealing promoted cancer stem cell properties.Free radical biology & medicine · 2021Article
- Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (BMP-2) Aggregates Can be Solubilized by Albumin-Investigation of BMP-2 Aggregation by Light Scattering and Electrophoresis.Pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- Tailoring the Interface of Biomaterials to Design Effective Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scaffold fabrication and biocompatibility are crucial for successful bone tissue engineering. Nanometer hydroxyapatite (nHAP) combined with collagen (COL) is frequently utilized as a suitable osseous scaffold material. Furthermore, growth factors, including bone morphogenetic protein‑2 (BMP‑2), are used to enhance the scaffold properties. The present study used blending and freeze‑drying methods to develop a BMP‑2‑nHAP‑COL scaffold. An ELISA was performed to determine the BMP‑2 release rate from the scaffold. Flow cytometry was used to identify rat bone marrow‑derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) prior to their combination with the scaffold. Scanning electron microscopy was used to observe the scaffold structure and BMSC morphology following seeding onto the scaffold. BMSCs were also used to assess the biological compatibility of the scaffold in vitro. BMP‑2‑nHAP‑COL and nHAP‑COL scaffolds were assessed alongside the appropriate control groups. Cells were counted to determine early cell adhesion. Cell Counting kit‑8 and alkaline phosphatase assays were used to detect cell proliferation and differentiation, respectively. Gross morphology confirmed that the BMP‑2‑nHAP‑COL scaffold microstructure conformed to the optimal characteristics of a bone tissue engineering scaffold. Furthermore, the BMP‑2‑nHAP‑COL scaffold exhibited no biological toxicity and was demonstrated to promote BMSC adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. The BMP‑2‑nHAP‑COL scaffold had good biocompatibility in vitro, and may therefore be modified further to construct an optimized scaffold for future bone tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.