Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29436569›Full record

ArticleSaudi medical journal2018

Knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceptions of clinicians towards conducting clinical trials in an Academic Tertiary Care Center.

Mohamad A Al-Tannir, Hind M Katan, Ahmad H Al-Badr, Mostafa M Al-Tannir, Amani K Abu-Shaheen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Characteristics of Clinical Studies Submitted to the Saudi Food and Drug Authority from 2009 until 2020.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamad A Al-TannirResearch Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail. maltannir@kfmc.med.sa.
Hind M Katan
Ahmad H Al-Badr
Mostafa M Al-Tannir
Amani K Abu-Shaheen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the knowledge, attitudes practices and perceptions of clinicians concerning the conducting of clinical trials (CTs).  Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on clinicians at King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire which divided into 5 sections: Section 1 covered respondents' demographics. The other 4 sections explored respondents' knowledge, attitudes, perceptions and practice towards conducting CTs.  Results: A total of 316 clinicians completed the questionnaire. The majority were assistant consultants and consultants 125 (39.5%) and 108 (34.2%), respectively. One hundred sixty-nine (56%) respondents were not aware of the Declaration of Helsinki at all. Two hundred seventy-five (88.4%) respondents expressed interest in conducting CTs and 61.7% and participants showed their willingness to facilitate and assist in CTs conducted by other clinicians. Moreover, 112 (35.9%) respondents participated in CTs previously. Regarding the disadvantages in conducting CTs, participants indicated that the paperwork was complicated and they believed that they might lose patients from their clinical practice once they are recruited in CTs. Lack of research protected time for clinicians 295 (97.7%), and a shortage of clinical research coordinators 293 (97%) were the main problems reported by respondents.  Conclusions: Although the majority of participants had an unsatisfactory level of knowledge and misperceptions about CTs, they showed an interest in and positive attitudes about conducting CTs.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical Trials as TopicHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBiomedical ResearchCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansTertiary Care CentersTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29436569
PMCPMC5885097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.