Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29436502›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2018

How oxygen gave rise to eukaryotic sex.

Elvira Hörandl, Dave Speijer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Eukaryogenesis: Did an Oxidative Crucible Result in Misleading Bioinformatic Analyses?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Eukaryogenesis From FECA to LECA: Radical Steps Along the Way.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. ROS are evolutionary conserved cell-to-cell stress signals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elvira HörandlDepartment of Systematics, Biodiversity and Evolution of Plants, University of Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany elvira.hoerandl@biologie.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7600-1128
Dave SpeijerDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands d.speijer@amc.uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2340-2753
University of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How did full meiotic eukaryotic sex evolve and what was the

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSexEukaryotaOxygenReactive Oxygen SpeciesSymbiosisOxygenReactive Oxygen SpecieseukaryotesmeiosisMuller's ratchetoxidative stressparadox of sex

Identifiers

PMID29436502
PMCPMC5829205
OpenAlexW2787782506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.