Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29436495›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Evidence for parent-of-origin effects and interparental conflict in seeds of an ancient flowering plant lineage.

Rebecca A Povilus, Pamela K Diggle, William E Friedman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Parental dialectic: Epigenetic conversations in endosperm.Current opinion in plant biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Water lilies, loss of woodiness, and model systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Water lily (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca A PovilusDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3812-2068
Pamela K DiggleDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
William E FriedmanDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA ned@oeb.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0374-3427
Harvard University · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical studies have long connected the evolutionary innovation of endosperm, a genetically biparental product of a double fertilization process unique to flowering plants (angiosperms), to conflicting parental interests over offspring provisioning. Yet, none of these studies examined interparental conflict in representatives of any of the most ancient angiosperm lineages. We performed reciprocal interploidy crosses in the water lily

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEndospermHybridization, GeneticNymphaeaceaePolyploidyReproductionSeedsendosperminterparental conflictinterploidy crossesorigin of angiospermsperispermseed development

Identifiers

PMID29436495
PMCPMC5829200
OpenAlexW2786767884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.