Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29436494›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Evolutionary time drives global tetrapod diversity.

Julie Marin, Giovanni Rapacciuolo, Gabriel C Costa, Catherine H Graham, Thomas M Brooks, Bruce E Young, Volker C Radeloff, Jocelyn E Behm, Matthew R Helmus, S Blair Hedges

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative isotope ecology of western Amazonian rainforest mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julie MarinCenter for Biodiversity, Temple University, 502 SERC Building, 1925 N. 12th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA juliemarin46@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7160-9302
Giovanni RapacciuoloLife and Environmental Sciences, University of California Merced, 5200 N Lake Road, Merced, CA 95340, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1494-9017
Gabriel C CostaDepartment of Biology, Auburn University at Montgomery, Montgomery, AL 36124, USA.
Catherine H GrahamSwiss Federal Institute for Forest Snow and Landscape, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Thomas M BrooksInternational Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8159-3116
Bruce E YoungNatureServe, 4600 N. Fairfax Drive, 7th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203, USA.
Volker C RadeloffSILVIS Lab, Department of Forestry and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Jocelyn E BehmCenter for Biodiversity, Temple University, 502 SERC Building, 1925 N. 12th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Matthew R HelmusCenter for Biodiversity, Temple University, 502 SERC Building, 1925 N. 12th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
S Blair HedgesCenter for Biodiversity, Temple University, 502 SERC Building, 1925 N. 12th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global variation in species richness is widely recognized, but the explanation for what drives it continues to be debated. Previous efforts have focused on a subset of potential drivers, including evolutionary rate, evolutionary time (maximum clade age of species restricted to a region), dispersal (migration from one region to another), ecological factors and climatic stability. However, no study has evaluated these competing hypotheses simultaneously at a broad spatial scale. Here, we examine their relative contribution in determining the richness of the most comprehensive dataset of tetrapods to our knowledge (84% of the described species), distinguishing between the direct influences of evolutionary rate, evolutionary time and dispersal, and the indirect influences of ecological factors and climatic stability through their effect on direct factors. We found that evolutionary time exerted a primary influence on species richness, with evolutionary rate being of secondary importance. By contrast, dispersal did not significantly affect richness patterns. Ecological and climatic stability factors influenced species richness indirectly by modifying evolutionary time (i.e. persistence time) and rate. Overall, our findings suggest that global heterogeneity in tetrapod richness is explained primarily by the length of time species have had to diversify.

Indexed as

AmphibiansBiodiversityBiological EvolutionBirdsMammalsReptilesAnimal DistributionAnimal MigrationAnimalsClimateTime Factorsclimatic stabilityenergy richnessevolutionary rateevolutionary timespecies richnesstetrapod

Identifiers

PMID29436494
PMCPMC5829197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.