Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29435869›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry2018

Ecto-enzymes activities in splenic lymphocytes of mice experimentally infected by Trypanosoma cruzi and treated with specific avian immunoglobulins: an attempt to improve the immune response.

Thirssa H Grando, Matheus D Baldissera, Guilherme Do Carmo, Camila B Oliveira, Eduarda T Santi, Pedro Henrique Doleski, Daniela B R Leal, Lenita Moura Stefani, Ricardo E Mendes, Aleksandro S Da Silva and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Avian Antibodies as Potential Therapeutic Tools.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thirssa H GrandoDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. thirssa_thi@hotmail.com.
Matheus D BaldisseraDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Guilherme Do CarmoDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Camila B OliveiraUniversidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Eduarda T SantiDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Pedro Henrique DoleskiDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Daniela B R LealDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Lenita Moura StefaniDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Ricardo E MendesVeterinary Pathology Laboratory, Instituto Federal Catarinense (IFC), Concórdia, SC, Brazil.
Aleksandro S Da SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Silvia G MonteiroDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina · BRInstituto Federal Catarinense · BRUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of specific avian polyclonal antibodies (IgY) against Trypanosoma cruzi and their interaction with ecto-enzymes of the purinergic system (NTPDase and adenosine deaminase (ADA) activities) in splenic lymphocytes. For this, mice were divided into six groups: three non-infected (A, B, and C) and three infected (D, E, and F). The groups A and D were composed by negative and positive controls, respectively; while the groups B and E were treated prophylactically with IgY (50 mg/kg), and the groups C and F were treated therapeutically with IgY (50 mg/kg). Treatment with IgY reduced parasitemia on day 6 post-infection (PI) compared to the infected control group, but it was similar on day 8 PI. Moreover, infected and treated animals (the groups E and F) did not show neither amastigotes in the cardiac tissue nor cardiac lesions when compared to the positive control group (the group D). The E-NTPDase (ATP and ADP as substrate) and ADA activities in splenic lymphocytes increased significantly in the positive control group (the group D) compared to the negative control group (the group A). The therapeutic treatment of IgY (the group F) was able to prevent the increase of E-NTPDase and E-ADA activities compared to the positive control group (the group D), but this finding was not observed in animals that received the prophylactic treatment (the group E). The therapeutic treatment of IgY may be considered an interesting approach to improve the immune response of mice experimentally infected by T. cruzi.

Indexed as

Adenosine DeaminaseChagas DiseaseProtozoan ProteinsSpleenTrypanosoma cruziAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAvian ProteinsChickensFemaleImmunoglobulinsLymphocytesMiceAdenosine DeaminaseAntibodies, ProtozoanAvian ProteinsIgYImmunoglobulinsProtozoan ProteinsAvian immunoglobulinsChagas diseaseEgg yolk antibodies

Identifiers

PMID29435869
OpenAlexW2792836997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.