Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29435800›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2018

The 'new normal': relativity of quality of life judgments in individuals with bipolar disorder-a qualitative study.

Emma Morton, Erin Michalak, Rachelle Hole, Simone Buzwell, Greg Murray

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Uncovering the story within the story: a scoping review of response shift in qualitative research.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma MortonFaculty of Health, Arts and Design Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6179-1983
Erin MichalakDivision of Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Rachelle HoleSchool of Social Work, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Simone BuzwellFaculty of Health, Arts and Design Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia.
Greg MurrayFaculty of Health, Arts and Design Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia. gwm@swin.edu.au.

Funding

CIHR RN174878-289596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeQuality of life (QoL) is increasingly a target of interventions for bipolar disorders (BD). While the subjective experience of consumers is often elevated as central to the construct of QoL in BD, limited investigation in this area means subjective QoL remains poorly understood. The present qualitative study seeks to address this by investigating how people with BD appraise the quality of their lives in the context of a QoL self-management intervention.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 43 individuals who had participated in a self-management intervention for improving QoL in BD. Individuals were questioned about experiences of the intervention and perceptions of their QoL. Thematic analysis was used to explore participants' appraisal of their QoL.

resultsAn overarching theme concerned the intrinsic relativity of subjective QoL: individuals located QoL as relative to self, others and possible futures. Incorporating illness-related reference points for QoL ('given my circumstances…') was associated with perceptions of improved QoL. Deliberately modifying reference points for QoL was perceived as self-compassionate.

conclusionThe present study generates novel hypotheses about how individuals with BD make sense of their QoL. Data suggest that individuals located their QoL relative to a variety of reference points, use of which was flexible. In accord with gap theories of QoL, individuals experienced acceptance of illness impacts as improving subjective sense of QoL. Rather than 'settling for' a lower standard of QoL, individuals experienced these changes as adaptive and positive. Findings are discussed in relation to the measurement and amelioration of QoL in BD.

Indexed as

AdultBipolar DisorderFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeYoung AdultBipolar disorderPsychiatricQualitativeQuality of lifeRecovery modelResponse shift

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.