Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29435756›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: which factors are related to open conversion? Lessons learned from 68 consecutive procedures in a high-volume pancreatic center.

Riccardo Casadei, Claudio Ricci, Carlo Alberto Pacilio, Carlo Ingaldi, Giovanni Taffurelli, Francesco Minni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Riccardo CasadeiDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy. riccardo.casadei@unibo.it.
Claudio RicciDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Carlo Alberto PacilioDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Carlo IngaldiDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanni TaffurelliDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco MinniDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic distal pancreatectomy represents a difficult surgical procedure with an high conversion rate to open procedure. The factors related to its difficulty and conversion to open distal pancreatectomy were rarely reported. The aim of the present study was to identify which factors are related to conversion from laparoscopic to open distal pancreatectomy.

methodsA retrospective study of a prospective database of 68 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was conducted at a high-volume center by pancreatic surgeons experienced with laparoscopic surgery. Pre-intra and postoperative data were collected. Patients who completed a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy were compared with those who needed a conversion to the open approach as regard demographic, clinical, radiological, and surgical data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out.

resultsUnivariate analysis suggested that the site of the lesion, the extension of pancreatic resection, and the requirement for an extended procedure to adjacent organs were significantly associated with the risk of conversion to the open approach. Multivariate analysis showed that only the extension of the pancreatic resection (subtotal pancreatectomy) was significantly related to the odds of conversion [odds ratio (OR) 19.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-32.3; P = 0.038]. Preoperative suspicion of malignancy differed between the two groups; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.078).

conclusionsDespite the limitations of the study, only the extension of pancreatic resection seemed to be the main factor related to conversion during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Indexed as

Hospitals, High-VolumeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalConversion to Open SurgeryFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesConversionLaparoscopic distal pancreatectomyOpen distal pancreatectomyPancreasPancreatic resection

Identifiers

PMID29435756
OpenAlexW2792958486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.