Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29435754›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

EAES classification of intraoperative adverse events in laparoscopic surgery.

N K Francis, N J Curtis, J A Conti, J D Foster, H J Bonjer, G B Hanna, EAES committees

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05270603 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparing the Reliability of a Web-based Intraoperative Adverse Event Assessment Tool With Standard Cognitive Grading. The Intraoperative Complication Assessment and Reporting With Universal Standards - Calculator (ICARUS-C)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2022 to 2022Enrolled2,000ConditionsIntraoperative Complications, Surgery--Complications, Surgery, Surgical Procedure, UnspecifiedArmsICARUS intraoperative adverse events calculator
NCT07568431 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Correlation of Cardiac Index Measured by the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) With Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) and Arterial Lactate Levels in Neonates and Infants Undergoing Surgical Repair of Aortic Coarctation: A Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKonya City HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled43ConditionsAortic Coarctation, Cardiac Output, LowArmsMostCare (PRAM), Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS), Arterial Blood Gas with Lactate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N K FrancisDepartment of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, BA21 4AT, UK. nader.francis@ydh.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8498-9175
N J CurtisDepartment of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, BA21 4AT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5655-6823
J A ContiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Cosham, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK.
J D FosterDepartment of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, BA21 4AT, UK.
H J BonjerDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
G B HannaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Level 10, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2897-0140
EAES committees

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical outcomes are traditionally evaluated by post-operative data such as histopathology and morbidity. Although these outcomes are reported using accepted systems, their ability to influence operative performance is limited by their retrospective application. Interest in direct measurement of intraoperative events is growing but no available systems applicable to routine practice exist. We aimed to develop a structured, practical method to report intraoperative adverse events enacted during minimal access surgical procedures.

methodsA structured mixed methodology approach was adopted. Current intraoperative adverse event reporting practices and desirable system characteristics were sought through a survey of the EAES executive. The observational clinical human reliability analysis method was applied to a series of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) case videos to identify intraoperative adverse events. In keeping with survey results, observed events were further categorised into non-consequential and consequential, which were further subdivided into four levels based upon the principle of therapy required to correct the event. A second survey phase explored usability, acceptability, face and content validity of the novel classification.

results217 h of TME surgery were analysed to develop and continually refine the five-point hierarchical structure. 34 EAES expert surgeons (69%) responded. The lack of an accepted system was the main barrier to routine reporting. Simplicity, reproducibility and clinical utility were identified as essential requirements. The observed distribution of intraoperative adverse events was 60.1% grade I (non-consequential), 37.1% grade II (minor corrective action), 2.4% grade III (major correction or change in post-operative care) and 0.1% grade IV (life threatening). 84% agreed with the proposed classification (Likert scale 4.04) and 92% felt it was applicable to their practice and incorporated all desirable characteristics.

conclusionA clinically applicable intraoperative adverse event classification, which is acceptable to expert surgeons, is reported and complements the objective assessment of minimal access surgical performance.

Indexed as

HumansIntraoperative ComplicationsLaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAdverse eventsClassificationEAESIntraoperativeLaparoscopicMorbidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.