Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29435747›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

Clinical versus patient-reported measures of depression in bariatric surgery.

Sudarshan Srivatsan, Vinay Guduguntla, Kelly Z Young, Aliasghar Arastu, Cameron R Strong, Ruth Cassidy, Amir A Ghaferi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sudarshan SrivatsanUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Vinay GuduguntlaUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kelly Z YoungUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Aliasghar ArastuUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Cameron R StrongUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ruth CassidyMichigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Amir A GhaferiUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. aghaferi@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8779-7726
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Failure to Rescure-Patient Safety Learning Lab (FTR-PSLL) P30HS024403 · AHRQ · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK · PI BLIKE, GEORGE T · 2015 to 2018
$3.8M
Understanding Variation in Failure to Rescue in the ElderyR01AG042340 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DIMICK, JUSTIN BRIGHAM · 2012 to 2014
$981k
Organizational Dynamics and Failure to Rescue After Major SurgeryK08HS023621 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GHAFERI, AMIR ABBAS · 2015 to 2019
$759k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS023621AHRQ HHS P30 HS024403NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBariatric surgery patients with mental illness may experience worse surgical outcomes compared to those without. Depression is the most prevalent mental health diagnosis amongst Americans with obesity. Accurate diagnosis and treatment is of paramount importance to mitigate perioperative risk. Unfortunately, there is no standard method to screen patients for depression prior to surgery. Our goal was to understand the relationship between traditional clinical screening tools and a novel patient-reported depression screening survey, Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8), in the setting of the bariatric surgery preoperative assessment.

methodsThe study included all adult bariatric surgery patients from January 2014 through June 2016. Patients who were not assessed using both the PHQ-8 and a traditional clinical depression screening were excluded from the study. There were a total of 4486 patients who met the eligibility criteria and were included in analysis. We used comparative statistics to examine the association between these screening tools and to test for contributing demographic, surgical, and socioeconomic factors.

resultsThe overall rate of clinically diagnosed depression in the study cohort was 45.6%. In comparison, 14.8% of all patients screened positive for depression using the PHQ-8. Of the patients without a traditional clinical diagnosis of depression, 10.2% screened positive for depression using the PHQ-8. This subset of undiagnosed patients was more likely to be non-white, employed, and had a higher BMI than their clinically diagnosed counterparts. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We found a higher rate of clinically diagnosed depression in our cohort compared to the general population. However, when using the validated PHQ-8 survey, the rate of depression more closely approximated the national incidence. Further, a significant proportion of patients were undiagnosed and/or misdiagnosed by current clinical assessments. Standardizing preoperative depression screening using validated patient-centered tools may prevent the consequences of untreated depression.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryPatient Health QuestionnairePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMichiganMiddle AgedPreoperative CareRegistriesBariatric surgeryDepressionMental health

Identifiers

PMID29435747
OpenAlexW2791643850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.