Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29435742›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2019

Information Needs Expressed During Patient-Oriented Oncology Consultations: Quantity, Variation, and Barriers.

Anesa Ahamad, Paul Wallner, Sharon Salenius, Rudi Ross, Eduardo Fernandez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Question prompts to empower cancer patients: results of a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Does basic information concerning nutrition improve the information needs of breast cancer patients? An evaluation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anesa AhamadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, 21st Century Oncology, 3426 North Roosevelt Boulevard, Key West, FL, 33040, USA. axa2011@med.miami.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1802-4495
Paul WallnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, 21st Century Oncology, Inc. 146 Sarazen Drive, Moorestown, NJ, 08057, USA.
Sharon SaleniusDepartment of Research and Education, 21st Century Oncology, 2234 Colonial Boulevard, Fort Myers, FL, 33907, USA.
Rudi RossDepartment of Research and Education, 21st Century Oncology, 2234 Colonial Boulevard, Fort Myers, FL, 33907, USA.
Eduardo FernandezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, 21st Century Oncology, 350 NW 84th Ave # 102, Plantation, FL, 33324, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality oncology consultation includes patient-oriented communication tailored to patients' individualized needs. Common methods used in studies to increase question-asking are prompt lists and coaching pre-consultations. However, our patients were encouraged to ask questions by the physician during their visit. We aimed to estimate the quantity, nature, and variation of their questions when they were invited to ask by their oncologist. During radiotherapy consultations from 2012 to 2016, patient's questions were deliberately elicited and physician-transcribed. We derived mean and median number of questions per patient, variance by patient factors, and a taxonomy of subjects using thematic analysis. Three hundred ninety-six patients asked 2386 questions, median asked per patient = 6 (interquartile range = 4). We found significant variance with age (mean = 6.9 questions for < 60 years, 5.4 for ≥ 70 years) p = 0.018, insurance type (mean = 4.7 for Medicaid, 7.2 for private insurance) p = 0.0004, and tumor site (mean number of questions: skin = 4.6, lymphoma = 5.2, lung = 5.8, breast = 6.1, prostate = 6.3, rectum = 6.7 head and neck = 6.9, brain = 7.0, bladder = 7.2, anus = 8.8, others = 5.8) p = 0.0440. Of the diverse set of 57 topics, the commonest were 1. logistics, 2. radiotherapy details, 3. side effects, 4. diagnosis, and 5. stage and prognosis. Only 17 topics were asked by more > 10% of patients and 40 topics were asked by < 10% of patients. With median of 6 questions, it is practicable to routinely elicit and address individualized information needs. Potential barriers may be older and underinsured patients. The wide variety of topics, often pertaining to individuals' case, suggests that cancer clinicians should take time-out during consultation to elicit patients' questions to accomplish best-practice communication.

Indexed as

CommunicationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDecision MakingFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInformation DisseminationMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsBarriers to communication, question-askingCancerCommunicationFrequently asked radiotherapy questionsNature of information needsOncologyPatient-centered communicationPatient-oriented communicationPatient-reported information needsPersonalized medicineQuantity of information needRadiotherapyVariation of information needs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.