Observational studyLung2018
Cardiovascular Studies in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Due to Biomass Smoke or Tobacco.
Observational study in Lung, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- MMP-9-C1562T polymorphism and susceptibility to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Cardiovascular health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe cardiovascular effects of biomass smoke exposure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are not well characterized, and few studies have assessed the possible differences between patients with disease caused by biomass smoke and tobacco. The aim of this study was to search for differences in cardiovascular variables between both types of the disease.
methodsTwenty subjects (15 men, 5 women) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease caused by tobacco were matched one to one for sex, age, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s to 20 patients with biomass-related disease. Echocardiography and carotid ultrasound studies were performed. Flow-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilatation and endothelium-independent vasodilatation were also measured.
resultsThere were no significant differences between groups in any of the echocardiographic variables, nor in the intima-media carotid thickness, the number of carotid plaques, or the percentage of endothelium-dependent or endothelium-independent vasodilation. A high percentage of patients in both groups showed an abnormal flow-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilatation pattern.
conclusionThe study does not support the hypothesis of a different cardiovascular effect of biomass or tobacco smoke exposure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cardiovascular comorbidity should be assessed in patients with biomass-associated disease, similarly to subjects with tobacco-related disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.