Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29435654›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2018

Standardised assessment of functioning in ADHD: consensus on the ICF Core Sets for ADHD.

Sven Bölte, Soheil Mahdi, David Coghill, Susan Shur-Fen Gau, Mats Granlund, Martin Holtmann, Sunil Karande, Florence Levy, Luis A Rohde, Wolfgang Segerer and 2 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sven BölteCenter of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND), Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. sven.bolte@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4579-4970
Soheil MahdiCenter of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND), Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
David CoghillDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Susan Shur-Fen GauDepartment of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Mats GranlundCHILD, SIDR, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Martin HoltmannLWL-University Hospital for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Ruhr University Bochum, Hamm, Germany.
Sunil KarandeLearning Disability Clinic, Department of Pediatrics, Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Florence LevySchool of Psychiatry, Prince of Wales Hospital and University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Luis A RohdeDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Wolfgang SegererSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Petrus J de VriesDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Melissa SelbICF Research Branch a cooperation partner within the WHO Collaborating Center for the Family of International Classifications in Germany (at DIMDI), Nottwil, Switzerland.

Funding

VINNOVA 259-2012-24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with significant impairments in social, educational, and occupational functioning, as well as specific strengths. Currently, there is no internationally accepted standard to assess the functioning of individuals with ADHD. WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-child and youth version (ICF) can serve as a conceptual basis for such a standard. The objective of this study is to develop a comprehensive, a common brief, and three age-appropriate brief ICF Core Sets for ADHD. Using a standardised methodology, four international preparatory studies generated 132 second-level ICF candidate categories that served as the basis for developing ADHD Core Sets. Using these categories and following an iterative consensus process, 20 ADHD experts from nine professional disciplines and representing all six WHO regions selected the most relevant categories to constitute the ADHD Core Sets. The consensus process resulted in 72 second-level ICF categories forming the comprehensive ICF Core Set-these represented 8 body functions, 35 activities and participation, and 29 environmental categories. A Common Brief Core Set that included 38 categories was also defined. Age-specific brief Core Sets included a 47 category preschool version for 0-5 years old, a 55 category school-age version for 6-16 years old, and a 52 category version for older adolescents and adults 17 years old and above. The ICF Core Sets for ADHD mark a milestone toward an internationally standardised functional assessment of ADHD across the lifespan, and across educational, administrative, clinical, and research settings.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthMaleADHDAssessmentConsensus conferenceDSMFunctioningICDICF Core SetsPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID29435654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.