ArticleDer Orthopade2018
[Periacetabular osteotomy-what influence does age have on patient-relevant results? : A prospective 5‑year investigation].
Article in Der Orthopade, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Substantial blood loss and transfusion burden after periacetabular osteotomy: Benchmark estimates from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Pooled it
- Association of tranexamic acid use and autologous predonation with blood loss and transfusion outcomes after periacetabular osteotomy: An arm-based multilevel meta analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Patients with borderline hip dysplasia present with inferior patient-reported outcomes compared to true hip dysplasia.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic hip dysplasia in middle aged patients: does age alone matter?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Periacetabular Osteotomy with a Modified Fixation Technique Using K-Wires Shows Clinical Results Comparable to Screw Fixation at Mid-Term Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- [Hip dysplasia: What influence do age, arthrosis and concomitant diseases have on the treatment result?]Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeriacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an effective procedure in treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia. To achieve a good outcome a strict patient selection has to be applied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of patient age at surgery on clinical outcome.
methodsIn a prospective study 86 patients (106 hips) underwent clinical and radiographic follow-up at a mean time of 5 years (2.5-8.5 years) after PAO. Patient-related outcome measurements (PROMs: EQ-5D, WOMAC, OHS, GTO) were applied preoperatively as well as postoperatively and the deformity correction as well as development of osteoarthritis were evaluated. In order to analyze the influence of patient age at surgery on clinical outcome, we subdivided the patient cohort into four different age groups (<20 years, 20-29 years, 30-39 years, >40 years).
resultsOf the patients 90% were very satisfied or satisfied with the results 5 years after surgery, and in all age groups PROMs significantly increased. Even though preoperative as well as postoperative algofunction declined in cohorts with increasing age, the overall benefit as measured in WOMAC and EQ-5D scores was equal in all age groups. Increasing age is associated with a progression in osteoarthritis as well as a higher conversion rate to total arthroplasty. DISCUSSION: Age is an important influencing factor on the long-term outcome after PAO. A certain age as cut off for indications could not be identified in this study. Even patients in the age groups 30-39 years and > 40 years showed PROM improvement and satisfaction with outcome at medium-term follow-up. The expected success rate has to be discussed preoperatively with the patient; however, as a higher conversion rate to hip arthroplasty as well as progressive osteoarthritis is associated with higher age, not only patient age alone but also morphological characteristics of the hip joint have to be taken into consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.