ArticleJournal of neuroimaging in psychiatry & neurology2017
N-of-1 Trial in Person with Pontine Stroke Receiving Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Hand Function.
Article in Journal of neuroimaging in psychiatry & neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The development of a set of key points to aid clinicians and researchers in designing and conducting n-of-1 trials.Trials · 2024Article
- Effect of rTMS intervention on upper limb motor function after stroke: A study based on fNIRS.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke characteristics vary widely between individuals making it difficult to assess the value of stroke rehabilitation interventions. To eliminate inter-subject variability, this study used an N-of-1 randomized, controlled design to explore the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in one unique individual with pontine stroke. We hypothesized that five days of active 6-Hz primed, low-frequency rTMS to the contralesional primary motor area (M1), combined with finger movement tracking training, would accomplish greater gains in hand function than sham rTMS combined with tracking training. We assessed hand function (Box and Block test and finger tracking test), cortical activation (laterality index during functional magnetic resonance imaging), and cortical excitability (interhemispheric inhibition testing (IHI) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)). Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) assessed the integrity of his corticospinal tracts at baseline. Results showed no improvement in the Box and Block or finger tracking tests, unreliable IHI findings, and no change in laterality index following active rTMS. DTI suggested truncation of the left corticospinal tract (CST) at the pons. His non-dexterous hand movements combined with no elicitable motor evoked potentials with TMS to ipsilesional M1 and his DTI findings lead us to speculate a reticulospinal mechanism for preserving his rudimentary paretic hand control. We conclude that rTMS combined with tracking training was not effective in the absence of CST pathways and that research is needed to confirm markers of reticulospinal function in humans as an alternative to defective CST function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29435516PMC5807012W2789765494What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.