ArticleFEBS open bio2018
The Stl repressor from
Article in FEBS open bio, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Full-length inhibitor protein is the most effective to perturb human dUTPase activity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The homodimerization domain of the Stl repressor is crucial for efficient inhibition of mycobacterial dUTPase.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Bacteriophage-Phage-Inducible Chromosomal Island Arms Race Designs an Interkingdom Inhibitor of dUTPases.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Detection of Genomic Uracil Patterns.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- The Role of a Key Amino Acid Position in Species-Specific Proteinaceous dUTPase Inhibition.Biomolecules · 2019Article
- Mass spectrometry-based analysis of macromolecular complexes ofFEBS open bio · 2019Article
- Structural model of human dUTPase in complex with a novel proteinaceous inhibitor.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA metabolism and repair is vital for the maintenance of genome integrity. Specific proteinaceous inhibitors of key factors in this process have high potential for deciphering pathways of DNA metabolism and repair. The dUTPase enzyme family is responsible for guarding against erroneous uracil incorporation into DNA. Here, we investigate whether the staphylococcal Stl repressor may interact with not only bacterial but also eukaryotic dUTPase. We provide experimental evidence for the formation of a strong complex between Stl and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.