Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29435324›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2018

Efficacy and safety of a novel high-dose mesalazine tablet in mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial.

Axel Dignass, Robert Schnabel, Jacek Romatowski, Vladimir Pavlenko, Andrey Dorofeyev, Jelena Derova, Laimas Jonaitis, Karin Dilger, Tanju Nacak, Roland Greinwald and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. United European gastroenterology journal · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Axel DignassDepartment of Medicine 1, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Robert SchnabelPannónia Magánorvosi Centrum Kft, Budapest, Hungary.
Jacek RomatowskiGastromed sc, Bialystok, Poland.
Vladimir PavlenkoState Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education, Stavropol, Russian Federation.
Andrey DorofeyevRegional Bowel Diseases Centre, Donetsk State Medical University, Donetsk, Ukraine.
Jelena DerovaLatvian Maritime Medical Centre, Riga, Latvia.
Laimas JonaitisDepartment of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Karin DilgerDrug Safety, Dr Falk Pharma GmbH, Freiburg, Germany.
Tanju NacakClinical Research and Development Department, Dr Falk Pharma GmbH, Freiburg, Germany.
Roland GreinwaldClinical Research and Development Department, Dr Falk Pharma GmbH, Freiburg, Germany.
International SAT-25 Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdherence to mesalazine treatment is essential for the successful treatment of ulcerative colitis.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety and preference of a novel high-dose 1000 mg mesalazine tablet versus conventional treatment for ulcerative colitis remission.

methodsThis pivotal phase III trial compared one 1000 mg mesalazine tablet (M1000 group) versus two registered 500 mg mesalazine tablets (M2x500 group), both taken three times daily, in patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis. The primary efficacy variable was clinical remission at week 8.

resultsA total of 306 patients were considered for intent-to-treat analysis. Clinical remission was achieved in 45.0% of the patients in the M1000 group versus 41.9% in the M2x500 group (

conclusionsThe novel high-dose 1000 mg mesalazine tablet is effective, non-inferior to the registered 500 mg mesalazine tablet, and safe for ulcerative colitis treatment. It was preferred by a majority of patients and may improve ulcerative colitis treatment adherence.

Indexed as

adherenceefficacyMesalazinerandomisedulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID29435324
PMCPMC5802664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.