Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29435305›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2018

Clinical significance of the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio for the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Masaki Kunizaki, Tetsuro Tominaga, Kouki Wakata, Takuro Miyazaki, Keitaro Matsumoto, Yorihisa Sumida, Shigekazu Hidaka, Takuya Yamasaki, Toru Yasutake, Terumitu Sawai and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masaki KunizakiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Tetsuro TominagaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Kouki WakataDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Takuro MiyazakiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Keitaro MatsumotoDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Yorihisa SumidaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Shigekazu HidakaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Takuya YamasakiDivision of Radiology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Toru YasutakeDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Terumitu SawaiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Ryuji HamamotoDivision of Molecular Modification and Cancer Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Atsushi NanashimaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Takeshi NagayasuDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Nagasaki University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic value of the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) and compare it with other inflammation-based prognostic scores (Glasgow prognostic score, modified Glasgow prognostic score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, prognostic nutritional index and prognostic index) in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). A database of 116 patients with primary ESCC who underwent treatment at the Division of Surgical Oncology at Nagasaki University Hospital between January 2007 and August 2014 was retrospectively reviewed and the correlations between CAR and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess independent prognostic factors. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to compare the prognostic value of different scores. According to the receiver operator characteristics analysis, the recommended cut-off value for CAR was 0.042, with an AUC of 0.678 (sensitivity 31.1%, specificity 66.7%). Thus, patients were dichotomized into low (<0.042) and high (≥0.042) CAR groups. On multivariate analysis, CAR was found to be significantly associated with OS in patients with ESCC [hazard ratio (HR)=2.350; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.189-4.650; P=0.014], as was tumor-node-metastasis stage (HR=3.059; 95% CI: 1.422-6.582; P=0.004). In addition, CAR had a higher AUC value (0.678) compared with several other systemic inflammation-based prognostic scores (P<0.001). This study suggested that CAR is a novel and promising inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with ESCC. Due to its simplicity, affordability and availability, CAR may be important for improving clinical decision-making and may contribute to more rational study design and analyses.

Indexed as

C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratioesophageal squamous cell carcinomainflammation-based prognostic score

Identifiers

PMID29435305
PMCPMC5776425
OpenAlexW2774867890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.