ArticleBiomedical reports2018
Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and susceptibility to recurrent pregnancy loss.
Article in Biomedical reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thrombophilic gene polymorphisms and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Pooled it
- A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Intimacy Problems, Stress Levels, and Couple Satisfaction among Women with Thrombophilia Affected by Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Identification of genetic alterations in couples and their products of conceptions from recurrent pregnancy loss in North Indian population.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have investigated the link between two different polymorphisms (C677T and A1298T) of the gene encoding methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL); however, the results remain controversial. This study aimed to provide greater insight into this debated topic. In the current study, two groups of pregnant women (group A: RPL women; group B: non-RPL women), each of which were subdivided further into two subgroups based on their gestational age, were screened for C677T and A1298T variants of the MTHFR gene. The resulting data were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Z test methods to compare the two groups. These ROC curve and Z test analyses indicated that there were no differences between the groups regarding C677T and A1298T expression. RPL is primarily caused by mutations in prothrombin or factor V Leiden genes. However, a low percentage of RPL cannot be attributed to these mutations. In the last five years, research has focused on the MTHFR gene, the two major variants of which (C677T and A1298T) have been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (thrombotic events) in homozygous individuals. In addition, these mutations may be related to an increased rate of neural tube defects in fetuses. While a link between MTHFR mutation and RPL may be expected based on previous findings, the present study indicated the absence of an association between the polymorphisms of the MTHFR gene and RPL risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.