Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29434956›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

Dynamics of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genomic editing of the

Irene Scharf, Lisa Bierbaumer, Heidemarie Huber, Philipp Wittmann, Christine Haider, Christine Pirker, Walter Berger, Wolfgang Mikulits

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advanced Nanotheranostics of CRISPR/Cas for Viral Hepatitis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Gene Editing in Clinical Practice: Where are We?Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irene ScharfDepartment of Medicine I, Institute of Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Lisa BierbaumerDepartment of Medicine I, Institute of Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Heidemarie HuberDepartment of Medicine I, Institute of Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Philipp WittmannDepartment of Medicine I, Institute of Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christine HaiderDepartment of Medicine I, Institute of Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christine PirkerDepartment of Medicine I, Institute of Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Walter BergerDepartment of Medicine I, Institute of Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang MikulitsDepartment of Medicine I, Institute of Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic editing using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology allows selective interference with gene expression. With this method, a multitude of haploid and diploid cells from different organisms have been employed to successfully generate knockouts of genes coding for proteins or small RNAs. Yet, cancer cells exhibiting an aberrant ploidy are considered to be less accessible to CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genomic editing, as amplifications of the targeted gene locus could hamper its effectiveness. Here we examined the suitability of CRISPR/Cas9 to knockout the receptor tyrosine kinase Axl in the human hepatoma cell lines HLF and SNU449. The genomic editing events were validated in two single cell clones each from putative HLF and SNU449 knockout cells (HLF-Axl

Indexed as

CRISPR/Cas9genomic editinghepatocellular carcinoma cell linesheterogeneitypolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID29434956
PMCPMC5777348
OpenAlexW2774641236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.