Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29434915›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

Immunohistochemical CD73 expression status in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms: A retrospective study of 136 patients.

Kohei Ono, Eisuke Shiozawa, Nobuyuki Ohike, Tomonori Fujii, Hideki Shibata, Tetsuya Kitajima, Koichiro Fujimasa, Naoko Okamoto, Yukiko Kawaguchi, Tasuku Nagumo and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Expanding Therapeutic Opportunities for Extrapulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kohei OnoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Eisuke ShiozawaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Nobuyuki OhikeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Aoba-ku, Yokohama 227-8501, Japan.
Tomonori FujiiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Hideki ShibataDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Tetsuya KitajimaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Koichiro FujimasaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Naoko OkamotoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Yukiko KawaguchiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Tasuku NagumoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Sakiko TazawaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Mayumi HommaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Toshiko Yamochi-OnizukaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Tomoko NoroseDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Aoba-ku, Yokohama 227-8501, Japan.
Hitoshi YoshidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Masahiko MurakamiDepartment of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Gensyu TateDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Masafumi TakimotoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Showa University · JPShowa University Fujigaoka Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WHO 2010 classification divides gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (GI-NENs) into neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G1, NET G2, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed adenoendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) groups. A total of 136 cases of GI-NENs diagnosed at our hospitals as gastrointestinal carcinoids, endocrine cell carcinomas and NENs over the last 11 years, using the WHO 2010 classification were assessed. Among the 136 cases, 88.2% (120/136) were classified into the NET group (NET G1/G2) and 11.8% (16/136) were classified into the NEC group (NEC/MANEC). The incidences of lymphatic and venous invasions were higher in the NEC group compared with in the NET group (P<0.0001 and P=0.0021, respectively). The immunohistochemical staining of cluster of differentiation 73 (CD73) was evaluated in GI-NENs. CD73 is a potentially useful molecule in tumor immunity. In general, CD73 on the tumor cell membrane converts adenosine monophosphate to adenosine, which restrains the production of interferon-γ and cytocidal activity. Although the association between stem cells of pancreatic NENs and CD73 has been reported, few studies have reported on CD73 expression in GI-NENs. Immunohistochemical CD73 expression on the cytomembrane of neuroendocrine cells was detected in 27.2% (37/136) of the GI-NENs. The positive ratio of CD73 was significantly higher in the NEC group compared with in the NET group (P=0.0015). CD73 is also considered as a potential biomarker of anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) therapy. The expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on the cytomembrane of GI-NENs was assessed. The positive ratio of PD-L1 was higher in the NEC group compared with in the NET group (P=0.0011). Furthermore, CD73 expression status was significantly correlated with PD-L1 expression (P<0.0001). These results indicate that CD73 may be an interesting candidate for a biomarker for certain prognostic factors and therapeutics concerning PD-1 therapy.

Indexed as

cluster of differentiation 73gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasmsimmunohistochemical stainingprogrammed death-1WHO2010 classification

Identifiers

PMID29434915
PMCPMC5776938
OpenAlexW2774089526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.