ArticleOncology letters2018
Association between expression of nuclear receptor co-activator 5 protein and prognosis in postoperative patients with osteosarcoma.
Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the expression of nuclear receptor co-activator 5 protein (NCOA5) and the prognosis of postoperative patients with osteosarcoma. Human osteosarcoma samples were collected from 145 patients and normal bone tissues were collected from 100 individuals as controls. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were employed to measure the levels of NCOA5 protein in cases of human osteosarcoma. The results from the RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that the positive rate of NCOA5 mRNA expression in human osteosarcoma was 17.24% (25/145). The positive rate in normal bone tissues was 84.00% (84/100), which was significantly higher compared with that of human osteosarcoma tissues (χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.