ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Clinical value of cardiac color ultrasound and cardiac troponin T combined with dynamic electrocardiogram in treatment of acute pulmonary embolism.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation of cardiac troponin T and APACHE III score with all-cause in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with acute pulmonary embolism.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical value of cardiac color ultrasound and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) combined with dynamic electrocardiogram in evaluating the treatment effect on acute pulmonary embolism (APE) was investigated. Ninety-eight patients with APE treated in Jinan Zhangqiu District Hospital of TCM from March 2016 to February 2017 were selected, and they were examined via the cardiac color ultrasound, cTnT and dynamic electrocardiogram to evaluate the clinical value in the treatment of pulmonary embolism. Electrocardiogram showed that there was no significant difference in the poor prognosis rate between right ventricular strain group and non-right ventricular strain group (P>0.05); the poor prognosis rate in cTnT positive group was significantly higher than that in cTnT negative group (P<0.05). Moreover, the ultrasonic cardiogram revealed that the poor prognosis rate in right ventricular dysfunction group was significantly higher than that in non-right ventricular dysfunction group (P<0.05). It was found in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis that the areas under the curve (AUC) of ROC detected via cardiac color ultrasound and cTnT were >0.9, while that detected via dynamic electrocardiogram was <0.7. Besides, logistic regression analysis showed that cTnT and right ventricular dysfunction were the risk factors affecting the poor prognosis of patients with APE (P<0.05). In conclusion, cardiac color ultrasound can predict the prognosis of patients with APE through monitoring the right ventricular function; cTnT can also evaluate the prognosis of APE; but the electrocardiogram has little significance in evaluating the prognosis of APE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.